UEFA Cup

UEFA Cup 1971-72

First Round

Hertha BSC FRG IF Elfsborg (Boras) Swe 3-1 4-1 7-2

Dundee Sco AB (Copenhagen) Den 4-2 1-0 5-2

Rosenborg BK Nor HIFK (Helsinki) Fin 3-0 1-0 4-0

Vasas SC Hun Shelbourne Irl 1-0 1-1 2-1

Glentoran Nir Eintracht Brunswick FRG 0-1 1-6 1-7

IBK (Keflavik) Isl Tottenham Hotspur Eng 1-6 0-9 1-15x

RC Celta Vigo Esp Aberdeen Sco 0-2 0-1 0-3

FC Den Haag Ned Aris Bonnevoie Lux 5-0 2-2 7-2

Wolverhampton Wanderers Eng Academica Coimbra Por 3-0 4-1 7-1

AS Saint-Etienne Fra 1.FC Cologne FRG 1-1 1-2 2-3

FC Lugano Sui Legia Warsaw Pol 1-3 0-0 1-3

FC Porto Por FC Nantes Fra 0-2 1-1 1-3

Hamburger SV FRG St. Johnstone Sco 2-1 0-3 2-4

Southampton Eng Athletic Bilbao Esp 2-1 0-2 2-3

Bologna Ita RSC Anderlecht Bel 1-1 2-0 3-1

SSC Napoli Ita Rapid Bucharest Rom 1-0 0-2 1-2

Vitoria FC (Setubal) Por Nimes Olympique Fra 1-0 1-2 *2-2

Atletico Madrid Esp Panionios Gre 2-1 0-1 2-2*

FC Carl Zeiss Jena GDR FC Lokomotiv (Plovdiv) Bul 3-0 1-3 4-3

FC Basle Sui Real Madrid Esp 1-2 1-2 2-4

Marsa Mlt Juventus Ita 0-6 0-5 0-11

NK Dinamo (Zagreb) Yug FC Botev (Vratza) Bul 6-1 2-1 8-2

UT Arad Rom SV Austria Salzburg Aut 4-1 1-3 5-4

Fenerbahce Tur Ferencvarosi Hun 1-1 1-3 2-4

AC Milan Ita Digenis (Morphou) Cyp 4-0 3-0 7-0

Spartak Moscow URS VSS Kosice Tch 2-0 1-2 3-2

OFK Belgrade Yug Djurgaardens IF Swe 4-1 2-2 6-3

FK Zeljeznicar (Sarajevo)Yug FC Brugge KV Bel 3-0 1-3 4-3

Hallescher FC Chemie GDR PSV (Eindhoven) Ned 0-0 0-0y

Zaglebie Walbrzych Pol Sklo Union Teplice Tch 1-0 3-2 4-2

Lierse SK Bel Leeds United Eng 0-2 4-0 4-2

SK Rapid Vienna walkover, KS Vllaznia (Shkoder) withdrew

x 1st leg in Reykjavik

y PSV walkover, HFC Chemie withdrew after 1st leg

Second Round

Rosenborg BK Nor Lierse SK Bel 4-1 0-3 4-4*

Rapid Bucharest Rom Legia Warsaw Pol 4-0 0-2 4-2

1.FC Cologne FRG Dundee Sco 2-1 2-4 4-5

FC Den Haag Ned Wolverhampton Wanderers Eng 1-3 0-4 1-7

FK Zeljeznicar (Sarajevo)Yug Bologna Ita 1-1 2-2 *3-3

FC Nantes Fra Tottenham Hotspur Eng 0-0 0-1 0-1

Eintracht Brunswick FRG Athletic Bilbao Esp 2-1 2-2 4-3

St. Johnstone Sco Vasas SC Hun 2-0 0-1 2-1

Spartak Moscow URS Vitoria FC (Setubal) Por 0-0 0-4 0-4

AC Milan Ita Hertha BSC FRG 4-2 1-2 5-4

OFK Belgrade Yug FC Carl Zeiss Jena GDR 1-1 0-4 1-5

Zaglebie Walbrzych Pol UT Arad Rom 1-1 1-2 2-3

NK Dinamo (Zagreb) Yug SK Rapid Vienna Aut 2-2 0-0 2-2*

Real Madrid Esp PSV (Eindhoven) Ned 3-1 0-2 3-3*+

Juventus Ita Aberdeen Sco 2-0 1-1 3-1

Ferencvarosi Hun Panionios Gre 6-0 6-0x

+ 2nd leg played in Den Bosch

x Ferencvarosi walkover, Panionios disqualified

Third Round

AC Milan Ita Dundee Sco 3-0 0-2 3-2

FC Carl Zeiss Jena GDR Wolverhampton Wanderers Eng 0-1 0-3 0-4

Eintracht Brunswick FRG Ferencvarosi Hun 1-1 2-5 3-6

PSV (Eindhoven) Ned Lierse SK Bel 1-0 0-4 1-4

SK Rapid Vienna Aut Juventus Ita 0-1 1-4 1-5

St. Johnstone Sco FK Zeljeznicar (Sarajevo)Yug 1-0 1-5 2-5

Tottenham Hotspur Eng Rapid Bucharest Rom 3-0 2-0 5-0

UT Arad Rom Vitoria FC (Setubal) Por 3-0 0-1 3-1

Quarter-Final

AC Milan Ita Lierse SK Bel 2-0 1-1 3-1

UT Arad Rom Tottenham Hotspur Eng 0-2 1-1 1-3

Ferencvarosi Hun FK Zeljeznicar (Sarajevo)Yug 1-2 2-1 3-3 5-4p

Juventus Ita Wolverhampton Wanderers Eng 1-1 1-2 2-3

Semi-Finals Tottenham

Hotspur Eng AC Milan Ita 2-1 1-1 3-2

Ferencvarosi Hun Wolverhampton Wanderers Eng 2-2 1-2 3-4

Final

1st Leg, Molineux Stadium, Wolverhampton, 3 May 1972, att 45000 Wolverhampton Wanderers (0) 1 Tottenham Hotspur (0) 2 57′ 0-1 TH: Chivers 72′ 1-1 WW: McCalliog 72 87′ 1-2 TH: Chivers

Tottenham Hotspur striker Martin Chivers outjumps Wolverhampton Wanderers defender Frank Munro to score the first goal during the UEFA Cup Final 1st leg at Molineux in Wolverhampton, 3rd May 1972. Martin Chivers scored twice for Tottenham as they won the 1st leg 2-1. (Photo by Popperfoto/Getty Images)

Wolverhampton Wanderers Parkes; Shaw, Taylor, Hegan, Munro, McAlle, McCalliog, Hibbitt, Richards, Dougan, Wagstaffe

Tottenham Hotspur Jennings; Kinnear, Knowles, Mullery, England, Beal, Gilzean, Perryman, Chivers, Peters, Coates (Pratt 68)

Referee: Bahramov (Soviet Union)

Final 2nd Leg, White Hart Lane, London, 17 May 1972, att 54000

Tottenham Hotspur (1) 1 Wolverhampton Wanderers (1) 1 30′ 1-0 TH: Mullery 41′ 1-1 WW: Wagstaffe

Tottenham won 3-2 on aggregate

Tottenham Hotspur Jennings; Kinnear, Knowles, Mullery, England, Beal, Gilzean, Perryman, Chivers, Peters, Coates

Wolverhampton Wanderers Parkes; Shaw, Taylor, Hegan, Munro, McAlle, McCalliog, Hibbitt (Bailey 55), Richards, Dougan (Curran 84), Wagstaffe

Referee: Van Ravens (Netherlands)

John Richards of Wolverhampton Wanderers shoots for goal with only Pat Jennings of Tottenham Hotspurs to beat but the goalkeeper puts out a leg and deflects the ball for a corner during the European Cup Final. Final score Wolverhampton 1 Tottenham 2. (Photo by PA Images via Getty Images)

Despair for Wolverhampton Wanderers defender Bernard Shaw as Tottenham celebrate after Martin Chivers (not in picture) had scored their 2nd goal during the League Cup Semi-Final 2nd leg between Tottenham Hotspur and Wolverhampton Wanderers at White Hart Lane in London, 30th December 1972. The match ended in a 2-2 draw, with Tottenham Hotspur winning 4-3 on aggregate. (Photo by Chris Smith/Popperfoto/Getty Images)

Wolves lost the English final by one goal. Unlucky.

Tottenham Hotspur won the first UEFA Cup. The new trophy was right for them – this squad deserved success and if English success was tough to achieve, then international success.

Switzerland

Switzerland. If Yugoslavia was at the top of the vast middle section of European football, the country in the Alps was pretty much at the end of the it – far from the flukes, but far from the top too. Swiss football is one of the oldest in Europe and very early organized in national league format. Yet, the country was never football power and with the switch from ‘mittel Europa’ to the South and West, the Swiss lost whatever authority their game had before the World War II. The sport itself was not especially popular – not too many chose football over alpine skiing, neither playing, nor watching. As a result, the country never produced a big club. Without big club, players never concentrated in one squad, preferring to stay at their local teams. Scattered talent, never in big supply anyway, led to unpredictable championships – nobody dominated the league and, thus, anybody could win. Swiss football was semi-professional, but seemingly the players were well off, for very rarely a Swiss player ventured to other European professional clubs. Abroad, the Swiss were often called ‘the wealthy part-timers’, not exactly a compliment. However, the Swiss imported foreign players – not many and not big names, but there was import further complicating evaluations: clearly, the Swiss system was purely amateur. It was not purely professional either – some players, even foreigners, maintained amateur status when playing for Swiss clubs. Others did not. A typical Swiss clubs at the time often had from one to three local stars, may be a foreigner or two, and the rest was filled with whatever was locally available. It was this structure which provided for relatively equal league, where any club could win, but also could be relegated. So far, the league was somewhat standard format – 14 teams, the bottom two relegated to the Second Division.

FC Basel won the title in 1972. The club was founded in 1893 and interestingly enough gave birth to the mighty FC Barcelona – one of the earliest captains of FC Basel, Joan Gamper, moved to Spain and was one of the founders of the Catalonian club. And not only that: according to one version, the famous blue and red kit of Barcelona copied Basel’s colours, thanks to Gamper. There are other stories for Barcelona’s kit, but whatever the real one is, Basel is some reason for the existence of Barcelona, yet, the ‘mother’ club never achieved the fame of the ‘child’. Basel won its first Swiss title in 1953 and until 1967 it was solitary title. The most successful years of the club started in 1966 and lasted until 1980 – in 1972 Basel added fifth title to the previous from 1953, 1967, 1969, and 1970.

The team was a typical Swiss squad, captained by the best Swiss player at the time Karl Odermatt. What different times! If it was now, the striker-midfielder would have been snatched by some of the big European clubs, but in 1972 there was no chance or even player’s desire to move abroad. Odermatt was probably underappreciated in Europe – he was good, but playing with insignificant teammates in insignificant league, he hardly impressed anybody but the Swiss. The other star player was the goalkeeper Marcel Kunz, also playing in the national team. Rene Hasler, Walter Balmer, and Walter Mundschin were more or less good players and that was that. But an interesting foreigner strengthened the squad: the West German Ottmar Hitzfeld. Yes, the famous contemporary coach! Not much of a player, though, which speaks for the level of Swiss football in the early 1970s. The biggest curiousity, however, is in something else: Hitzfeld wanted to play at the Olympic Games, and that was his reason for moving to the Swiss club. His scheme worked: he became Swiss champion; maintained his amateur status; and played for West Germany in the Summer Olympics 1972, ending with bronze medal. Which at the end only deepens the enigma of Swiss football – was it a professional one, since foreigners were able to stay amateur by Olympic requirements? How were the players, particularly foreign ones, paid, if they were officially amateurs? Switzerland is expensive country – how was Hitzfeld, for instance, paying his daily expenses if he was not professional player? Questions, or no questions, FC Basel were champions, finishing 4 points ahead of FC Zurich and losing only one match during the season. Hitzfeld had to wait many, many years until adding another title to his resume – as a coach.

Cup Winners Cup

Cup Winners’ Cup 1971-72

Preliminary Round

B1909 (Odense) Den FK Austria (Vienna) Aut 4-2 0-2 4-4*

Hibernians (Paola) Mlt Fram (Reykjavik) Isl 3-0 0-2 3-2x x 2nd leg in Malta

First Round

Servette FC Geneva Sui Liverpool Eng 2-1 0-2 2-3

Distillery Nir FC Barcelona Esp 1-3 0-4 1-7

Berliner FC Dynamo GDR Cardiff City Wal 1-1 1-1 2-2 5-4p

Jeunesse Hautcharage Lux Chelsea Eng 0-8 0-13 0-21x

Limerick Irl Torino Ita 0-1 0-4 0-5

KS Dinamo (Tirane) Alb FK Austria (Vienna) Aut 1-1 0-1 1-2

Stade Rennais Fra Rangers Sco 1-1 0-1 1-2

Hibernians (Paola) Mlt Steaua Bucharest Rom 0-0 0-1 0-1

Sporting CP (Lisbon) Por SFK Lyn Nor 4-0 3-0 7-0

TJ Skoda Pilzen Tch Bayern Munich FRG 0-1 1-6 1-7

Komloi Banyasz Hun Red Star (Belgrade) Yug 2-7 2-1 4-8

Olympiakos (Pireus) Gre Dinamo Moscow URS 0-2 2-1 2-3

FC Levski-Spartak Bul Sparta Rotterdam Ned 1-1 0-2 1-3

Zaglebie Sosnowiec Pol Atvidabergs FF Swe 3-4 1-1 4-5

MP (Mikkeli) Fin Eskisehirspor Tur 0-0 0-4 0-4

Beerschot VAV Bel Anorthosis (Famagusta) Cyp 7-0 1-0 8-0y

x 1st leg in Luxembourg y 2nd leg in Antwerpen

Second Round

Liverpool Eng Bayern Munich FRG 0-0 1-3 1-3

Atvidabergs FF Swe Chelsea Eng 0-0 1-1 *1-1

Torino Ita FK Austria (Vienna) Aut 1-0 0-0 1-0

Rangers Sco Sporting CP (Lisbon) Por 3-2 3-4 *6-6 aet

Beerschot VAV Bel Berliner FC Dynamo GDR 1-3 1-3 2-6

Sparta Rotterdam Ned Red Star (Belgrade) Yug 1-1 1-2 2-3

FC Barcelona Esp Steaua Bucharest Rom 0-1 1-2 1-3

Eskisehirspor Tur Dinamo Moscow URS 0-1 0-1 0-2

Quarter-Finals

Torino Ita Rangers Sco 1-1 0-1 1-2

Steaua Bucharest Rom Bayern Munich FRG 1-1 0-0 1-1*

Atvidabergs FF Swe Berliner FC Dynamo GDR 0-2 2-2 2-4x

Red Star (Belgrade) Yug Dinamo Moscow URS 1-2 1-1 2-3

y x 1st leg in Stockholm y 2nd leg in Tashkent

Semi-Finals

Bayern Munich FRG Rangers Sco 1-1 0-2 1-3

Berliner FC Dynamo GDR Dinamo Moscow URS 1-1 1-1 2-2x 1-4p

x 2nd leg in Lwow

Final, Nou Camp Stadium, Barcelona, 24 May 1972, att 35000 Rangers (2) 3 Dinamo Moscow (0) 2 23′ 1-0 R: Stein 40′ 2-0 R: Johnston 49′ 3-0 R: Johnston 60′ 3-1 DM: Estrekov 87′ 3-2 M: Makovikov

Rangers McCloy; Jardine, Johnstone, Smith, Mathieson; Greig, Conn, MacDonald, McLean, Stein, Johnston

Dinamo Moscow Pilgui; Basalayev, Dolmatov, Zykov, Dolbonosov (Gershkovich 69); Zhukov, Baydachny, Yakubik (Eshtrekov 56), Sabo; Makhovikov, Yevryuzhikhin

Referee: Ortiz de Mendíbil (Spain)

Rangers celebrated.

Dynamo protested, UEFA ignored the protest, the result stayed. Rightly or wrongly, Dynamo lost. Yes, there was pitch invasion by Rangers’ fans, cutting the game a few minutes shorter than regulated time. Yes, there was possiblity for equalizing goal.

Glasgow Rangers won the Cup – their ony Europen trophy so far. A bit tainted too – nothing wrong with the players, but their fans interupted the final beforev time. Yet, a great success.

Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia was more fun. On one hand, the local rivalry was more complex – between Belgrade and Croat clubs, itself split into two more big rivalries – between Crvena zvezda and Partizan in Belgrade, and Dynamo (Zagreb) and Hajduk (Split) in Croatia. On the other hand, Yugoslav football was interesting to watch. It was fairly competitive championship full of technical players – the Yugoslavs boasted to be the ‘Brazilians of Europe’ for good reason.

Zeljeznicar (Sarajevo) were the surprise champions in 1972. Not a bad club, but they belonged to the ‘secondary’ clubs of the league. It was not clear why they won – Crvena zvezda had very, very good squad at that time. Hajduk too. The other two big clubs were in relative decline, yet judging by the players not exactly worse than the team from Bosna and Herzegovina. Zeljeznicar had only three noticeable players – Josip Bukal, Josip Katalinski, and Enver Hadziabdic. Bukal was getting old, and apparently no longer needed for national duty, he was allowed to join Standard (Liege) after winning the title. Katalinski was younger and just establishing his place in the national team competing with strong players from other clubs – not yet undisputed star. The rest of the team was quite unknown. At first glance, it looked like the Soviet case – smaller club, having decent squad, using rare lapse of the establishment. Unlike Zarya (Voroshilovgrad), Zeljeznicar won fairly – no bribes and wild schemes.

 

 

The captain Bukal lifts the cup of champions. I fell in love with Zeljeznicar’s kit – the unusual combination of blue and … blue. Alas, this was a beginning of dominance – it was the only title the club won in its Yugoslavian history.

The first team was: Janjuš, D. Kojović, Bećirspahić, Bratić, Katalinski, Hadžiabdić, Jelušić, Janković, Bukal, Sprečo, Deraković.

Champions’ Cup

Champions’ Cup 1971-72

Additional Match Details Preliminary Round

Valencia Esp US Luxembourg Lux 3-1 1-0 4-1

First Round

Galatasaray Tur CSKA Moscow URS 1-1 0-3 1-4

Standard CL (Liege) Bel Linfield Nir 2-0 3-2 5-2

B 1903 (Copenhagen) Den Celtic Sco 2-1 0-3 2-4

Feyenoord Ned Olympiakos (Nicosia) Cyp 8-0 9-0 17-0w

Internazionale Ita AEK (Athens) Gre 4-1 2-3 6-4

Ujpesti Dozsa Hun Malmo FF Swe 4-0 0-1 4-1 Valencia Esp

NK Hajduk (Split) Yug 0-0 1-1 *1-1

Cork Hibernians Irl Borussia Monchengladbach FRG 0-5 1-2 1-7

Wacker Innsbruck Aut SL Benfica Por 0-4 1-3 1-7

Ajax Ned SG Dynamo Dresden GDR 2-0 0-0 2-0

Stromsgodset IF Nor Arsenal Eng 1-3 0-4 1-7x

Dinamo Bucharest Rom Spartak Trnava Tch 0-0 2-2 *2-2

Olympique Marseille Fra Gornik Zabrze Pol 2-1 1-1 3-2y

CSKA (Sofia) Bul KS Partizani (Tirane) Alb 3-0 1-0 4-0

Lahden Reipas Fin Grasshopper-Club Zurich Sui 1-1 0-8 1-9

IA (Akranes) Isl Sliema Wanderers Mlt 0-4 0-0 0-4z w 2nd leg in Rotterdam x 1st leg in Oslo y 2nd leg in Katowice z 1st leg in Malta

Second Round

CSKA Moscow URS Standard CL (Liege) Bel 1-0 0-2 1-2

Dinamo Bucharest Rom Feyenoord Ned 0-3 0-2 0-5

Valencia Esp Ujpesti Dozsa Hun 0-1 1-2 1-3

Internazionale Ita Borussia Monchengladbach FRG 4-2 0-0 4-2x

SL Benfica Por CSKA (Sofia) Bul 2-1 0-0 2-1

Grasshopper-Club Zurich Sui Arsenal Eng 0-2 0-3 0-5

Olympique Marseille Fra Ajax Ned 1-2 1-4 2-6

Celtic Sco Sliema Wanderers Mlt 5-0 2-1 7-1

x Borussia Monchengladbach were originally drawn at home and won the first leg 7-1. During the match, Roberto Boninsegna was carried off, allegedly having been hit by a beer can. The match was annulled and UEFA ordered a replay in West-Berlin, which took place after Internazionale’s home match.

Quarter-Finals

Ajax Ned Arsenal Eng 2-1 1-0 3-1

Feyenoord Ned SL Benfica Por 1-0 1-5 2-5

Ujpesti Dozsa Hun Celtic Sco 1-2 1-1 2-3

Internazionale Ita Standard CL (Liege) Bel 1-0 1-2 *2-2

Semi-Finals

Ajax Ned SL Benfica Por 1-0 0-0 1-0

Internazionale Ita Celtic Sco 0-0 0-0 0-0 5-4p

Final, Feyenoord Stadium, Rotterdam, 31 May 1972, att 61000

Ajax (0) 2 Internazionale (0) 0 47′

1-0 A: Cruyff 78′

2-0 A: Cruyff

Ajax (trainer Kovacs) Stuy; Suurbier, Blankenburg, Hulshoff, Krol; Neeskens, Haan, G.Mühren; Swart,Cruijff, Keizer

Internazionale (trainer Invernizzi) Bordon, Burgnich, Facchetti, Bellugi, Oriali; Giubertoni (Bertini 12), Bedin, Frustalupi; Jair (Pellizarro 58), Mazzola, Boninsegna Referee: Helles (France)

Second Champions Cup in a row.

Inter was outplayed. Standing from left: Bordon, Fabbian, Bellugi, Corso, Facchetti, Invernizzi (all.), Ghio, Giubertoni, Boninsegna, Mazzola, Vieri.

Sitting: Bertini, Oriali, Jair, Burgnich, Cacciatori, Bedin, Frustalupi, Silva, Pellizzaro, Della Casa (mass.)

Simply the best.

Hungary

Deeper in the bowels of European football fun was dubious. Old rivalries commanded domestic scenes – usually two or three clubs well above the rest, but ever the same. Changes were slow, if any. Traditions informed outcomes, quite predictable. Thus, in Hungary the 1950s power Honved (Budapest) was no longer a factor – Ferencvaros and Ujpest Dozsa dominated Hungarian football, with Ujpest Dozsa eventually having the upper hand in the first half of the 1970s. Ferencvaros had aging squad, led by the great Florian Albert already near retirement. Their Budapest rivals had younger squad, led by the unfortunate Ferenc Bene. Also getting long in the tooth, Bene was caught between generations – when Albert was in his prime, Bene was in his shadow; when Bene became old – younger Fasekas and still younger than Fasekas Nyilasi were making the waves. Either too young or too old, Bene played in difficult years for Hungary – still expected to be ‘big’, but failing to reach such expectations, in its slow decline. Olympic champions in 1968, but not qualifying for World Cup 1970. Fourth at the European Championship 1972 – but failing to reach World Cup finals in 1974. Bene played in this national squad… his Ujpest Dozsa won the Hungarian title, but Albert’s Ferencvaros won the Cup in 1972. Yet, to my mind Ujpest Dozsa of that time were the last decent Hungarian club squad. By 1974 they played close approximation of total football and were fun to watch. Close… but not close enough: hardly impressed anyone on the international scene.

Under appreciated Ferenc Bene.

Bene lifts the cup… the Championship trophy or the Hungarian Cup? National success never transformed into international neither for him, nor for Ujpest Dozsa, nor for the national team of Hungary. Fading power.

Intercontinental Cup

Intercontinental Cup.


1st. leg:
Venue: Avellaneda. Field: Independiente ("La Doble Visera").
September 6, 1972.
   
Independiente (Argentina) 1-1 (0-1) Ajax (Netherlands)
0-1  5' Johan Cruijff
1-1 81' Francisco "Pancho" Sa


Independiente:  Miguel Ángel Santoro - Eduardo Comisso, Miguel Ángel López, Francisco Pedro Manuel Sa, Ricardo Elbio Pavoni - José Omar Pastoriza, Alejandro Estanislao Semenewicz,Miguel Ángel Raimondo (Carlos Alberto Bulla) - Agustín Alberto Balbuena, Eduardo Andrés Magglioni,Dante Mírcoli.
Ajax:Heinz Stuy - Horst Blankenburg, Wim Suurbier, Barry Hulshoff, Ruud Krol, Arie Haan, Johan Neeskens, Gerrie Mühren, Sjaak Swart,Johan Cruijff (Arnold Mühren), Piet Keizer.



2nd. leg:
Venue: Amsterdam. Field: Olympisch Stadion.
September 28, 1972.

Ajax (Netherlands) 3-0 Independiente (Argentina)
Goals: Johan Neeskens, Johnny Rep (2).





 




Ajax:Heinz Stuy - Horst Blankenburg, Wim Suurbier, Barry Hulshoff,Ruud Krol, Arie Haan, Johan Neeskens, Gerrie Mühren,Sjaak Swart (Johnny Rep), Johan Cruijff, Piet Keizer.                Coach: Stefan Kovacs.
Independiente:  Miguel Ángel Santoro - Eduardo Comisso, Miguel Ángel López, Francisco Pedro Manuel Sa,Ricardo Elbio Pavoni - José Omar Pastoriza, Alejandro Estanislao Semenewicz,Luis Garisto - Agustín Balbuena, Eduardo Andrés Magglioni,                Dante Mírcoli (Carlos Alberto Bulla).

Piet Keizer receives the Cup.

The triumphal run of the winners.

Independiente was outplayed, sometimes by their own (dirty) game. No luck this year, so what can be remembered is their unusual kit – blue so dark, it looked like black.

Often this photo is presented as one of the final – yes, the team is the same, but Ajax played entirely in white in Avellaneda. Standing from left: Heinz Stuy, Barry Hulshoff, Wim Suurbier, Blankenburg, Ruud Krol; Bottom : Johan Cruyff, Arie Haan, Sjaak Swart, Johan Neeskens, Gerrie Muhren, Piet Keizer.

Simply the best in the world! They survived threats (Hulshoff had to be assigned as bodyguard to Cruijff in Argentina), dirty play – which they matched fearlessly, tough opponent and got the world crown. They proved they were best of all, but this was the only time the great Ajax played for the Intercontinental Cup.

 

USSR the Cup

The Soviet Cup winners were another small club – Torpedo (Moscow). Generally, they ranked forth among Moscow clubs – behind Spartak, Dynamo, and CSKA, and above Lokomotiv. Occasionally, Torpedo won a title or a cup, but never were dominating Soviet football even briefly. The 1960s were good years for the small Torpedo, and the early 70s still preserved some of the strength.

Cup winners, but not really noticeable team – only the captain Vadim Nikonov was considered promising player in 1972. He never became a star. Good for the small boys, though.

The unusual and different winners of Soviet tournaments in the beginning of the 70s was more sigh of a deep crisis than improvement. By 1972 Soviet football was similar to Italian, yet bleaker. As in Italy, most games ended in scoreless draws. Contrary to Italy, it was not a result of ultradefensive schemes, but a result of scared calculations – a draw brought a point, a win – two points. It was the universal point system then, and collecting point after point was rewarding enough. Nobody really played to win and the safest strategy to squirrel a point was not to show any ambition to score a goal – thus, by silent agreement, everybody was simply killing the time. Desire to score was dangerous – the opposition immediately sensed treachery, and after they begin attacking who knows what may happen… better just to kick the ball around innocently. It was this mentality which at the end reduced sharply the quality, never very high anyway, of Soviet football and made possible for smaller clubs to win titles and cups. May be this mentality also helped the shift from Moscow to the South – southern clubs, technically superior, managed to score the occasional goal, whether the clumsier Moscow players failed, and thus the southerners collected more points by the virtue of handful of wins. The problem became so huge, the Federation eventually tackled it by introducing a limit of draws, not giving points for scoreless matches, and shoot-outs after draws, providing one point for the winner and zero for the loser. Nothing worked – the clubs were tricky: as soon as scoreless draws were not bringing points, the teams started quickly to score a goal to each other in the first minutes of the match, going to sleep immediately after that. Limit of draws was also found useful in perverse way – to lull opposition into collecting draws over the permitted limit was basically to deprive them of points. Amazingly, Soviet football became anti-football. From this perspective winners like Zarya and Torpedo were just the opposite of improvement and excitement.

Copa Libertadores

Copa Libertadores. First Round

Nacional (Montevideo) bye to the second round as holders.

Group 1 [Argentina, Colombia]
1.Independiente (Avellaneda) 6 4 2 0 13- 5 10
2.Rosario Central 6 3 2 1 8- 5 8
3.Independiente Santa Fe (Bogotá) 6 1 2 3 4- 9 4
4.Atlético Nacional (Medellín) 6 0 2 4 3- 9 2

Group 2 [Bolivia, Ecuador]
1.Barcelona (Guayaquil) 6 3 3 0 8- 3 9
2.América (Quito) 6 3 1 2 9- 7 7
3.Oriente Petrolero (Santa Cruz) 6 2 2 2 10- 7 6
4.Chaco Petrolero (La Paz) 6 1 0 5 3-13 2

Group 3 [Brazil, Paraguay]
1.São Paulo 6 3 2 1 12- 6 8
2.Olimpia (Asunción) 6 2 2 2 7- 8 6
3.Cerro Porteño (Asunción) 6 2 2 2 7-11 6
4.Atlético Mineiro (Belo Horiz.) 6 0 4 2 5- 6 4

Group 4 [Chile, Peru]
1.Universitario (Lima) 6 3 2 1 9- 6 8
2.Universidad de Chile (Santiago) 6 3 0 3 12-12 6
3.Alianza (Lima) 6 2 2 2 10-10 6
4.Unión San Felipe 6 1 2 3 5- 8 4

Group 5 [Uruguay, Venezuela]

1.Peñarol (Montevideo) 4 4 0 0 12- 3 8
2.Deportivo Italia (Caracas) 4 1 1 2 4- 7 3
3.Valencia (Acarigua) 4 0 1 3 3- 9 1

Semi-Finals

Group 1
1.Universitario (Lima) 4 1 2 1 9- 7 4
2.Nacional (Montevideo) 4 1 2 1 7- 7 4
3.Peñarol (Montevideo) 4 1 2 1 5- 7 4

Group 2
1.Independiente (Avellaneda) 4 2 1 1 4- 2 5
2.São Paulo 4 1 2 1 2- 3 4
3.Barcelona (Guayaquil) 4 0 3 1 2- 3 3

Final (May 17 & 24)
Universitario Per Independiente Arg 0-0 1-2 1-2

1st leg. Estadio Nacional, Lima, 17- 5-1972

Universitario – Independiente 0-0

Universitario: Ballesteros, Soría, Cuellar, Chumpítaz, Luna, Techera,
Carbonell (Uribe), Castañeda, Ramírez, Rojas, Bailetti.
Independiente: Santoro, Commisso, Sá, Garisto, Pavoni, Pastoriza, Raimondo,
Semenewicz, Balbuena, Mircoli, Saggioratto (Bulla).

Referee: Marques (Brazil)
Attendance: 45,000

2nd leg. Cordero, Avellaneda, 24- 5-1972

Independiente – Universitario 2-1
6′ Maglioni 1-0
61′ Maglioni 2-0
79′ Rojas 2-1

Independiente: Santoro, Commisso, Sá, Garisto, Pavoni, Pastoriza, Raimondo,
Semenewicz, Balbuena, Maglioni (Magán), Saggioratto (Mircoli).
Universitario: Ballesteros, Soría, Cuellar, Chumpítaz, Luna, Techera
(Alva), Cruzado, Castañeda, Munante, Rojas, Ramírez (Bailetti).

Referee: Favilli Neto (Brazil)
Attendance: 55,000
Independiente got the trophy!

Universitario (Lima) lost the final by one goal. May be unlucky after an excellent campaign – especially because they played part of it without 5 national team players! They were the first Peruvian team to reach the final.

South American champions for a third time! Although the picture is from the semi-final, this was squad winning the final.

The team was getting old – there were some players (Santoro, for instance) who appeared in the first won final in 1964, but they had not only experience and smooth understanding – they had younger and eager reserves. For the moment, they equalized the record of Estudiantes (La Plata) and Penarol (Montevideo), leading with them the South American clubs with 3 Libertadores Cups each.

Sweet success, but it was only the beginning of the greatest period of the club.

USSR Championship

Portugal and Belgium maintained position at the top of the middle group of championships – but nothing new there: Benfica and Anderlecht both made doubles, but Benfica was declining and Anderlecht did not emerged yet as strong club internationally. France remained the same too – pleasant football, nothing special… Olympique Marseille dominated the scene, winning both the championship and the cup. The Soviets? About the hidden bribery scandal you can read in the early posting. Thanks to it, Zarya (Voroshilovgrad) ended champions.

The clubs’s logo back in 1972. Today is different, as well as the country is different, the name of the club, and the name of their home town – it is Zorya (Lugansk, Ukraine). Back to Soviet days, though:

 

In his 2007 interview the coach German Zonin vigorously negated the bribery story – according to him, Zarya won the title fair and square. Zonin’s denial is understandable – there is no coach to admit bribery. Besides, this is the only title Zonin won in his long career. So, what is true? Small clubs, with good, even not outstanding squads, occasionally win titles. As a rule, such surprising winners never repeat their success, quickly sinking to familiar mediocrity. It is well traveled path: big clubs immediately snatch whatever talent emerged in the small club, and the winning team is shattered. From this standpoint, Zonin appears truthful… unless one reads between the lines. Zonin praised the Communist satrap of Voroshilovgrad at the time: the City’s Party Secretary ‘cared a lot for the sports’ and ‘supported the club with everything’. It is more than likely the Party boss went much wider in his support – making deals with other Party secretaries, who in turn ‘influenced’ the clubs in their domains to give a point or two. Money – or other things – went along. A coach did not have to be involved. He even did not have to know – such things were arranged on Party level, and were typical in Communist Eastern Europe. But there is another interesting detail: Zonin blamed Dynamo (Kiev) for the immediate decline of Zarya – they took two key players, Onishchenko and Vyacheslav Semenov. No real fuss over Onishchenko, for he was originally Dynamo player and going back was understandable. Semenov, according to Zonin, was another story – vastly talented, the coach claims, he was very important to Zarya. Dynamo not only did not need him, but actually ruined him during his short stay in Kiev. So far – the typical small club story… except: Kiev, as republican centre, ‘naturally’ takes the cream of the whole of Ukraine. No way for small club saving their good players – bigger and more powerful Communist bosses order the smaller fry and that’s was that. Dynamo took only two players from Zarya, one of them originally a Dynamo player anyway. The second – not needed and benched. This largely means Zarya did not really have interesting players – rather, run of the mill squad. Confirmed by other evidence: some players, Semenov included, briefly played for the national/Olympic Soviet squad. Very briefly and only at the time when Zonin himself was assistant coach of the Olympic team. Only Onishchenko became a real star and constant national player – but playing for Dynamo (Kiev). Nobody else impressed and lasted. Zarya players were not interesting for other clubs – no Moscow club wanted them, not Dynamo (Kiev), not even the second big Ukrainian club – Shakter (Donetzk). Apart from Onishchenko, only the goalkeeper Alexander Tkachenko built good reputation – eventually not only playing for many years, but moving to Zenith (Leningrad). Yet, even this transfer is suspect: it happened when Zonin coached Zenith, which was not at all big club at that time. Zarya were obviously good by the standards of small clubs; the squad had good chemistry, reaching their peak in 1972, but hardly superior team even then. Muddy the bribery story may be, as such stories ever go, but very likely. More than likely. Nevertheless, nothing was said at the time, the title stands. Which at the end makes briberies irrelevant – at least in terms of historic record and largely by the history of the club. Champions. Once. Once upon a time.