Author: Vesselin

Copa America.
One has to go a couple of years back, when a plan for revitalizing the oldest continental championship was designed. CONMEBOL decided on championship every 2 years hosted by each country. Argentina was the first host in 1987 and the last was to be Venezuela in 2007. Long term plan, well thought. Reality was against it, as always – the first was the formula. Given the limited number of countries, it was hard to find a formula exciting enough to lure the fans. Travel was expensive for them. Aging venues were also becoming severe problem – pitch, players and journalists facilities, new era of fan violence and security. There were also old habits – for years many countries used the tournament for experiments, not always fielding their best, especially when World Cup was near, as it was in 1989. Copa America was scheduled just before the World Cup qualifications and for the strongest teams it was a tournament of secondary importance. And on top of it many clubs refused to release players for Copa America – not a new problem, but looming larger by the end of the 1980s. As ever, there were newly appointed coaches, who started building their teams anew and that in passionate South America most often was met with severe criticism and scandals. No matter the intentions of CONMEBOL, South American attitudes were capable of blocking any reasonable planning.
So, this was the second issue of the new plan and Brazil was the host – something happening for the first time since 1949. The formula of the 1987 Copa America was harshly criticized and changed – this time it was 2 round-robin groups of 5 teams each at first. The top 2 teams qualified for the final stage, also playing round-robin. To the displeasure of the hosts, CONMEBOL did not allow 24-players rosters, but – also as usual – decided on compromise making little sense: 20 players were allowed in the first phase, but for the final stage – 24. The tournament was to be played in the cities of Goiania, Recife, Rio de Janeiro, and Salvador. The first stage was scheduled in Goiania, Recife, and Salvador and the final stage was entirely to be played on Maracana, Rio de Janeiro. The choice of cities created enormous scandal for team Brazil and its coach. Most teams, Brazil included, had new coaches, so they were somewhat ‘raw’, in building stage, hoping to be ready for the World Cup qualifications. For Carlos Bilardo’s Argentina it was clearly preparatory tournament – the only competitive games the reigning World champions had to play between 1986 and 1990. Bilardo indicated that Copa America was not all that important – it was more or less a training stage, getting ready for defending the world title next year. Yet, Argentina was a favourite. Uruguay too – they won the previous 2 continental championships. Brazil – always a favourite, although success in Copa America was lacking. Along with the traditional favourites, Colombia, Chile, and Paraguay were likely candidates to reach the final stage – rapidly rising Colombia, very promising Chile in the previous Copa America, and unpredictable Paraguay, which was always viewed with caution in South America, for they were traditionally difficult to beat and capable of surprises.
Few teams were weakened by absence of stars – European clubs refused to release players, so Paraguay was without Roberto Cabanas (Brest), Julio Cesar Romero (Barcelona), Jose Luis Chilavert (Real Zaragoza), and Jorge Nunes (Deportivo Cali). Chile was without Ivo Basay (Reims), Ivan Zamorano, Hugo Rubio, and Jorge Aravena. On the other hand, the veteran goalkeeper Oscar Raul Wirth was in the team without playing for any club, the only player without a club in the tournament. Argentina and Brazil had similar problems – Maradona was unhappy with Italy by now and there were rumours for his transfer from Napoli to Olympique Marseille. Mentally, he was tired and involved with other things. Since Argentina depended on him, it was not at all sure the team will play strong football and Bilardo indicated so as well. There were various new players to be tested – one of them was new only for Bilardo’s selections: Gabriel Calderon had strong season with Paris St. Germain and was called
back to the national team for the first time since 1982 World Cup. To a point, it was experimental squad eventually to be shaped slowly for the 1990 World Cup.
Brazil, with new coach – Sebastiao Lazaroni – presented plethora of problems. The first was Lazaroni’s approach – he declared that his team will play modern European football, which in Brazil always translated as defensive football both as real coach’s intentions and popular perception. The battle between ‘Jogo Bonito’ and ‘European’ football was old and tiresome by now – more or less, started around 1970 and not moving an inch so far. Lazaroni proclaimed that his team will play 5-3-2, with a libero and 2 stoppers in defense. ‘European’ football brought nothing good for Brazil so far, yet, coach after coach (including generally attacking minded coaches like Zagalo and Tele Santana) proclaimed their desire to bring the country up to date. In the case of Lazaroni, trouble started right away – not only he wanted defensive team, but designated Mauro Galvao as his libero – and it was the position Mauro Galvao played in his club. Further, Lazaroni’s selection was torpedoed by absences – Jorginho and Careca were injured. Julio Cesar and Carlos Mozer were not released by Montpellier and Olympique Marseille. Muller (Torino) was eventually released, but arrived only 3 days before the star of Copa America and Lazaroni judged him not ready and will select him for the World Cup qualifications. Muller left the team in anger. Out of regulars, Lazaroni hastily called Baltazar (Atletico Madrid) and Charles (Bahia). The last call proved to be a bomb, which exploded and almost finished the coach – outside the state of Bahia, the inclusion of Charles was immediately criticized: it was seen as only diplomatic call to gall locals, for team Brazil was playing its opening games in Salvador, the capital of Bahia. Locally, everybody thought their star must be a regular. Lazaroni had no real intention of using Charles and the locals rebelled, the coach was nastily criticized in the local media, his abilities were questioned, team Brazil was booed and met with great hostility instead of support. In part, that came from CONMEBOL’s refusal to allow 24-man squads in the opening stage of the tournament. Lazaroni wanted the big number in order of trying various options and Charles was part of this building process – but with only 20 players allowed the team had to be reduced and Charles (along with goalkeeper Ze Carlos) was out.Perhaps Lazaroni did not want that at all, but was forced by circumstances, but the people of Bahia were infuriated. Locally, it was predicted that Lazaroni will be fired right away and the coach immediately was on very slippery slope, for his defensive ‘European’ football was severely criticized nationwide. Suddenly Brazil was in big trouble – much bigger than any other team.
So, scandals from start and in such typically South American atmosphere little attention was paid on more significant and real changes: the most important one was change of guard – most teams had not only new coaches, but young coaches (including 38-years old Lazaroni). A new generation with new ideas and better tuned to contemporary football. Colombian Francisco Maturana was also young, but also experienced, cutting his teeth at the 1987 Copa America. He was the chief representative of the new wave at the moment, yet, it was the debut of fairly unknown Uruguayan perhaps the most important – Oscar Washington Tabarez was just appointed as coach of Uruguay and although his team presented no revolutionary changes (in terms of selected players), he immediately created a long term plan for developing the national team of Uruguay, which practically involved the whole Uruguayan football – from kids to first team, clubs included. This plan is still in use and produced wonderful results for many, many years. From another angle modernization came from Ecuador – they appointed the Yugoslav Dusan Draskovic as a coach of the national team. It was direct employ of European modern methods by hiring an European. At a glimpse, the old guard of South American football was practically represented only by Carlos Bilardo and Brazilian Pepe, coaching Peru – all others, whether domestic or imported coaches (5 countries had foreign coaches) were quite young. The new wave as refreshing, yet, to a point – the problems of South American football were a big barrier to those trying to implement new ideas and could be said that coaches largely depended on the talent at hand – Maturana was lucky to have exciting players, lead by Valderrama, but Tabarez had to tailor his ideas to the players he had, most of them experienced and defensive minded. If Draskovic was relatively free to try his vision in Ecuador, Pepe had little options – Peruvian football was in decline and virtually lacked new talented players. As good as the new Chilean generation was, it was a matter of few players – not enough for full team even, so Wirth, without a club to play for, had to be included. Take a handful of stars and most countries had almost nothing left. Take away a few players and even Lazaroni’s ideas were curtailed – and that speaking a such enormous pool of talent as Brazil. Anyhow, enough of that – Copa America was starting.

1989
Copa America was the big event of the year.
At least for one country, the South American championship was historic moment. Of course, Copa America was not all. Growing displeasure with the football of 1980s was leading to changes. Some were already occurring, somewhat quietly – the 3-point for a win rule was increasing implemented by the European countries. Somewhat without notice 3 foreign players were allowed to play. AC Milan was perhaps the team most associated with this change not only because they were wonderful and dominating team, but also because very soon the club will make the next step towards further increase of the foreign players. It was inevitable: by the end of the 80s European football was firmly professional and imported players were essential to the growing professionalism – at the end of the 1988 only two European countries did not export players (Albania and East Germany) and only 7 did not import (USSR, Albania, East Germany, Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, and Czechoslovakia). In 1989 all that changed with the sudden collapse of Communism. Political changes, impossible to imagine at the end of 1988, changed Europe and with that – the football world. Yet, there was little real optimism at the end a decade considered overall ugly in every football aspect – from fan violence to dirty and unpleasant football on the pitch and aging crumbling venues.

Debut. It is fun to think about it – when Oliver Kahn was born, Klaus Fichtel was already national team regular for 2 years and nearing his greatest international success. Yet, both players appeared in the same season – one ending and the other beginning a career. The newcomer will be much more famous and successful than the veteran, but if debuts are compared… Fichtel became impressive regular from start and national team player the next season, Kahn was hardly noticed.
Born in 1969, Oliver Kahn debuted in 1987-88 season, still 18-years old.
He was new reserve goalkeeper for Karlsruher SC and played his first Bundesliga game on November 27, 1987, against 1.FC Koln. Hardly a debut worth remembering… Karslruher SC lost 0-4. This season Kahn played only one more game and continued in the same way until 1990. In his first 3 years as a professional Kahn played more for the second team of Karlsruher SC than the first – 73 games in the lower West German divisions. True, goalkeepers rarely become stars from their first appearance, usually they need to mature, but not only in his first season Oliver Kahn did not make impression of possible solid player, let alone world-famous star. Then again, he was just 18-years old, debuting at time when players under 20 were considered too fragile for the tough professional football and had to be introduced carefully to the harsh reality. How wise – or consistent – was such attitude is another matter, but a debut with disastrous loss is hardly encouraging any coach to field again ‘born loser’. Eventually, Oliver Kahn would get what he was after, but that required a lot of motivation, courage, and even cynicism. Which made him a true child of his time – but that is in the future. The present was only a brief record of yet another debutante, who may or may not make a career in professional football.

Retirement. Football is merciless – knowing only today and almost never remembering yesterday. By 1988 Klaus Fichtel was some long forgotten past… Yet, he was not long forgotten past, but something more, best summarized with one simple sentence: the central-defender was born 1944, debuted in 1965-66 and retired after the 1987-88 season at the age of 44!
Born in Castrup-Rauxel, Province of Westphalia, he debuted for Schalke 04 in 1965-66 – it was interesting debut: on one hand, Fichtel was rather old debutante – 21-years old, not 17 or 18. He was just acquired by Schalke 04 from his original club Arminia (Ickern). On the other hand, his debut was more than impressive – he played in every game of the season: 34. And there was no stopping after that.
More: his talent was not just local – debuting in the season after which West Germany played at the final of 1966 World Cup, he debuted for the national team in 1967 and played a total of 23 games for it, scoring 1 goal (against Scotland in 1969). However, Fichtel played for West Germany only 4 years, 1967-71. Such was his fate…
His peak with the national team was 1970, playing at the World Cup in Mexico.
Everything looked just fine next to Helmut Schon.
Fichtel (dribbling here between Uruguyans) was solid regular – 5 matches at the finals – and one of the memorable stars of impressive team.
26-years old, Klaus Fichtel was seen as one of the modern players, changing the game – a defender capable of attacking. Young enough to shine for many years – but… his very age was his undoing. At first Fichtel was seen as natural replacement of Karl-Heinz Schnellinger and Willy Schulz, competing only with Wolfgang Weber and Bernd Patzke. But Beckenbauer moved back to play a libero and the duo Beckenbauer – Schwarzenbeck made it virtually impossible for any other player to appear in the national team. Unfortunately for Fichtel, he had mighty competition in his own generation and considered now and then by Schon, he never played for the national team after 1971. With irreplaceable regulars, Schon – especially after 1974 – was looking for younger substitutes. When Beckenbauer retired from the national team Fichtel was already over 30 too, not a natural replacement. By 1978 he was almost forgotten by the football world – he had no part of the the great success of West Germany in 1972 and 1974 and playing for Schalke 04 contributed somewhat negatively: his club’s involvement in the infamous bribing scandal in 1971 put a bit of a stigma even on players not involved like Klaus Fichtel. Ironically, this was the time of his greatest success as a club player – he won the West German Cup in 1972 with Schalke 04. His only trophy… But the wonderful squad was destroyed by the bribing scandal in the same time, so… no return to the national team and no more trophies.
In 1980 Klaus Fichtel moved from Schalke 04 to Werder (Bremen), which meant going to play in Second Division… True, just a single season – in which Fichtel played in every match, 42 games – but there was little glory to taste second-level football. Such a league did not exist when Fichtel debuted, so, to a point, he distinguished himself by playing in both professional leagues of West Germany. Two more season with Werder followed – again in the Bundesliga – and the veteran, now 40 years old, moved back to Schalke 04 in 1984.

He was no longer a regular starter, but played to the end – 11 games in his last season. When he stepped down, Fichtel had a total of 552 games in the Bundesliga and 14 goals. 42 games in the 2. Bundesliga. 23 games for the national team. Bronze medals from the 1970 World Cup. Could have been more successful – and more famous, therefore – if he was born a few years earlier, or a few years later. He was regarded as a sweeper in the time of the libero – another handicap… His loyalty to Schalke 04, where he played almost 20 years, also worked against him: the bribing scandal and the following decline of the team, put the player as well on the back burner. If there was no Beckenbauer, if Fichtel played for Bayern of Borussia Moenchengladbach… such whining is pointless at the end. Fichtel was great player with fantastic longevity – consider that in the late 1960s and up the 1990 the common wisdom was that a player turning 30 is on his last legs. Playing top league football and in West Germany at that at 44 was almost beyond imagination. After 23 years of professional football Klaus Fichtel finally called it quits.

European Player of the Year. 24 players got points, but as usual the best players came from the most successful teams – Holland and USSR this year, the finalists of the European championship, and the winner got the laurels: three Dutchmen were on top. Frank Rijkaard ended 3rd with 45 points, Ruud Gullit – 2nd with 88 points, and Marco van Basten on top with 129 points.
There was hardly any doubt about the mighty trio, playing for Milan – their names were on everybody’s lips, they were the best players in Europe and it was really difficult to say who was best of the three. They were instrumental for Dutch victory of the European championship.
Very often at least two of the great stars were present in the same picture, such was the rapport between them.
Shining on the pitch together, receiving awards together.
Paul Breitner certainly was happy to present awards rather than playing against van Basten & friends.
The spectacular winning goal van Basten scored at the European final perhaps tipped the scale in his favour at the end.
But it was splendid season for him and it was not just the great goal at the final.
The elegant, technical and deadly striker deserved to be voted first in Europe – this was the first such award for Marco van Basten and not the last.

The Golden Shoe. No scandal this season and new winner:
Tanju Colak (Galatasaray) scored 39 goals and won, followed by John Eriksen (Servette and Denmark) with 36 goals and Victor Pitrurca (Steaua and Romania) with 34.
Colak was already impressive name in Turkey, where he scored 123 goals in 157 games for Samsunspor. For that Galatasaray bought him and he became the top scorer of Europe in his first season with red-yellow jersey.
As many great scorers, 25-years old Tanju Colak delighted the crowds with spectacular goals. Well deserved award.

Luxembourg. Ranked last in Europe – 33rd. If Malta was enlarging their top league, Luxembourg was reducing the top league from 12 to 10 teams the next season. Thus, 3 teams were relegated and only one promoted. On the top – single and familiar dominance.
CS Petange won the Second Division championship and the single promotion this year. It was a return to top flight.
US Rumelange was the outsider in the top league – last with 10 points. Three teams ended with 16 points and goal-difference decided their fate: Aris (Bonnevoie) took 11th place and Alliance (Dudelange) – 10th. They were relegated along with US Rumelange. Swift (Hesperange) survived on 9th place.
At the top Avenir (Beggen) played well as usual, but not well enough to compete for the title – they finished 3rd with 28 points. Spora (Luxembourg) and Jeunesse (Esch) fought bitterly for the title. Jeunesse bested Spora by a single point and won the title with 34 points from 15 wins, 4 draws, and 3 losses. 53-20 goal-difference.
Avenir attempted to get a trophy, reaching the Cup final, where they met Jeunesse. Again, Jeunesse prevailed: 1-0.
Thus, Jeunesse triumphed with a double – it was their 6th. Their total record increased to 21 titles and 9 Cups.

Malta. Ranked 32nd. The smallest European league was increasing – going from 8 to 9 teams the next year, so one team was relegated and 2 promoted from Second Division. On the field – impressive dominance of a club not exactly known for great success.
Rabat Ajax and Naxxar Lions earned promotion from Second Division.
Mosta finished last in the top league with 9 points and was relegated. They lost a battle of 4 teams – Birkirkara ended 7th with 10 points and survived because of the league increase. Floriana was 6th also with 10 points, but with better goal-difference than Birkirkara. Hibernians finished 5th with 11 points.
Weak season for Valletta – 4th with 13 points.
Zurrieq got bronze medals with 18 points and Sliema Wanderers – silver with 19 points.
Hamrun Spartans repeated their success of the previous season: they won the title again with 22 points from 9 wins, 4 tiles and single loss. 21-5 goal-difference.
But they also won the Cup again, beating Floriana 4-2 at the final.
A second consecutive double – rare achievement of any club, making their record 6 titles and 2 Cups. Excellent!

Iceland – ranked 31st. One more country using 3 points for a win rule. But not much about this championship – one team dominated it. The top two leagues had 10 teams each. Two teams relegated and two – promoted.
Second Division.
Fylkir – 2nd with 33 points and promoted.
FH – champions with 44 points from 14 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses. 47-20 goal-difference. Promoted, of course.
First Division. At the end of the table – outsiders without any bite.
Volsingur – last with 9 points.
Leiftur – 9th also with 9 points. Ahead of Volsingur on better goal-difference, but this was purely academic – both outsiders went down.
IA Akranes had solid season as usual and finished 3rd with 32 points.
Valur finished 2nd with 41 points.
Fram (Reykjavik) dominated this season and easily won the title with 49 points from 16 wins, 1 tie and single lost match. Excellent goal-difference too: 38-8. Thus, Fram increased its record to 17 titles.
The Cup final opposed Valur and IBK Keflavik. Valur prevailed 1-0.
IBK Keflavik had poor season – they finished 8th in the championship – so the Cup was their good chance and they tried hard, but lost.
Valur (Reykjavik), although well behind city rivals Fram, still ended the year with a trophy – they won their 5th Cup. Not bad at all.

Eire. Ranked 30th. Dramatic battle between 3 teams for the title.
Second Division – 10 teams, 2 promoted. Three former top league teams were stronger than the rest, but two of them were not not up to the task of return among the best.
Cobh Ramblers were the pleasant surprise – they finished 2nd with 38 points and were promoted. A new name to play in the First Division.
Athlone Town won the championship with 39 points: 19 wins, 1 draw, 7 losses, 42-22. They prevailed over Cobh Ramblers, but the most important was the promotion back to top league.
First Division – 2 teams were hopeless outsiders, so no drama at the bottom, but the race for the title was dramatic. The formula of the 12-team league was every team playing 3 times against the others to the tune of 33 championship rounds.
Sligo Rovers ended last with 13 points.
Bray Wanderers was going down as well – 11th with 18 points.
Derry City had rather weak season – 8th with 31 points.
Bohemians, St. Patrick’s Athletic and Dundalk fought for the title and at the end 1 point was the decisive difference. Bohemians was disappointed – 3rd with 45 points.
St. Patrick’s Athletic managed to finish above Bohemians, thanks to 2 goals better goal-difference. But they also finished with 45 points and lost the title. Still, it was not all that bad – they clinched the Irish UEFA Cup spot.
Dundalk clinched the title with 46 points: 19 wins, 8 draws, 6 losses, 54-32.
It was not all for the champions – they reached the Cup final too, where Derry City opposed them. The final was controversial.
The Northern Ireland-based finalist gave the final distinct foreign flavour – Derry City had only 1 player from Eire, but had also players from France, England, Scotland and South Africa (Owen Da Gama above hailed from South Africa). In the bitter weather, they were seemingly the better team, but the referee… gave questionable penalty to Dundalk and put a blind eye to two Derry City penalty claims. Dundalk scored what was given and the end was 1-0 for them.
Dundalk got the Cup.
Derry City had reason to think they were wronged and most likely they were, but after a weak season they were still going to play a bit of European football in the Cup Winners Cup as losing finalists. They were also a good example of the vast changes in the European football in the 1980s – now even lowly leagues used foreign players.

Dundalk with a double, but both trophies were won in dramatic manner. Certainly not a domineering squad – rather sturdy fighters. The boys increased the club record to 7 titles and 8 Cups. They won the second double for Dundalk, after waiting a decade for such triumph (the first double Dundalk won in 1978-79).