Uruguay II Division

Uruguay. Conservative approach – nothing changed in the structure and the championship formula, only the top league was going to be of 14 teams in the next season. Thus, no relegation in both first and second divisions.
Paysandu was the champion of the interior – and this success meant very little, for there was no team located outside Montevideo in the top two divisions.
Basanez won Third Division and was promoted to Primera B. The status quo remained – one more Montevideo club won third level and went up.
Primera B – Second Division. 10 teams, as usual, playing twice against each other, The top three teams in the regular championship went to final stage to compete for promotion. No relegation this year. All teams from Montevideo.
Colon – last with 8 points. Interestingly, they were the 5th high scoring team with 22 goals in 18 games.
Villa Espanola – 9th with 10 points.
Fenix – 8th with 13 points. They won only once, but tied 11 games.
Sportivo Italiano – 7th with 17 points.
Miramar Misiones – 6th with 18 points.
Rampla Juniors – 5th with 19 points.
El Tanque Sisley – 4th with 19 points.
Sud America – 3rd with 24 points.
Racing – 2nd with 26 points.

Cerrito – 1st with 26 points. Apparently, placed on top on better head-to-head record against Racing, but that meant little – the championship had a final stage.
Final stage – round-robin tournament between the top three teams in the regular championship. Points from the first stage carried over.
Sud America – 3rd with 2 points: 0 wins, 2 ties, 0 losses, 2-2. Total – 26 points.
Cerrito – 2nd with 27 points. Their final stage record: 0 1 1 and 1-3.
Racing (Montevideo) won the decisive match against Cerrito in the final stage and thus won the championship. Their final stage added 3 points to the 26 they earned in the regular championship: 1 1 0 and 3-1. Thus, 29 points altogether. Standing from left: Rafael Villazán, Héctor Tuja, Mario Delgado, Alberto Bica, Néstor Rosa.
First row: Venancio Ramos, Domingo Cáceres, Sergio González, Luis Fernández, Luis Cardozo, Miguel González.
Great success for the small club – they rarely played in the top division. Going up was wonderful.

Argentina I Division

First Division. The European experiments trying to invigorate the stale football of the 1980s reached Argentina too – new point system was introduced this season: no more ties. Instead 3 points were given for a win and a tied match was followed by penalty shoot-out. The winner in that got 2 points and the loser – 1 point. The other unusual feature was the unofficial Apertura tournament to determinate the 2 Argentine teams for 1989 Copa Libertadores. Thus, the Argentine champion for 1989 was to play in the 1990 Copa Libertadores. Relegation went by the long established relegation table – the last two teams in it. Because of this relegation rule the last team in the championship remained in the league – weird, but rules are rules.
Instituto (Cordoba) finished last with 31 points. In the relegation table they were 18th and were not relegated. Very poor season, but one can note a player with quite a high profile in the 1990s – Dely Valdes.
Deportivo Armenio ended 19th with 37 points. They went down – last in the relegation table.
Ferrocarril Oeste – 18th with 45 points. There great days were over, but relegation was not for them yet.
San Martin (Tucuman) – 17th with 46 points. The relegation table worked against them, as it worked against Deportivo Armenio: in it, they were last. Like Deportivo Armenio, they did not play in the top league continuously in the last 3 seasons and that was one major reason for having so bad combined record. They were relegated.
Racing (Cordoba) – 16th with 50 points.
Platense – 15th with 50 points.
Textil (Mandiyu) – 14th with 51 points. Relatively strong season kept them in the league – like San Martin (Tucuman), they were just promoted to Primera Division and their relegation record consisted only of this season’s points – but because they played well enough, they ended 15th in the relegation table. Good for one more season at least. More intriguing is their name – they are generally known as Deportivo Mandiyu and under this name appeared in magazines and so on. But not in the final table… in it they are named Textil. May be the club changed name during the season… a mystery. Textil or Deportivo, they had the league record of ties in this championship – 19 games. Of them, they won 11 in the penalty shoot-outs.
Rosario Central – 13th with 51 points.

Newell’s Old Boys – 12th with 51 points. For a team featuring Sensini, Batistuta, ‘Tata’ Martino, Dario Franco, Norberto Scoponi – quite a disappointing season. Especially when they reached the Copa Libertadores final in 1988. May be the players were still too young to be able to endure long gruelling season and the Copa Libertadores effort took they their attention away from the domestic championship. May be that, or may be the best talent was already attracted by lucrative contracts abroad. Whatever the case, it was disappointing season – perhaps the biggest slump in the league at that time.
Velez Sarsfield – 11th with 53 points. Young Diego Simeone here, but the biggest puzzlement come from the presence Gareca. In 1989 he was still a player of Colombian America (Cali). So… the photo, although from 1989, belongs to 1989-90 season – most likely, that’s the case, for Colombian season was canceled in October. Velez Sarsfield won most penalty shoot-outs in the championship: 12 out of 17 ties.
Gimnasia y Esgrima (La Plata) – 10th with 57 points.
Racing (Avellaneda) – 9th with 59 points. Like Velez Sarsfield, it is not certain to which season the photo belongs – to 1988-89 or to 1989-90 – but in general would not matter much: Racing was going through their long convulsions, which started back in the 1960s. Bankruptcy was looming large, not success.
Estudiantes (La Plata) – 8th with 61 points. As usual, ahead of local rivals Gimnasia y Esgrima, but that was all this season.
Argentinos Juniors – 7th with 61 points. Not bad at all – they managed to stay quite strong for a small club, routinely losing their best players to other clubs.
Talleres (Cordoba) – 6th with 65 points. Good season for a good squad.
For the sake of variety, San Lorenzo de Almagro dressed in their reserve kit. 5th with 66 points. If anything, San Lorenzo knew how to stay among the strongest.
River Plate – 4th with 67 points. This squad could be considered a failure… Menotti was the coach and the selection was stellar. At least, on paper… Perhaps not entirely completed and balanced, but given the current reality of Argentine football – the stars constantly going to Europe, that is – a very impressive squad. On paper… Claudio Borghi is here, but eventually went to play in Brazil – more or less, on his way going down. Seemingly, the magic of Menotti dried up already as well.
Deportivo Espanol – 3rd with 68 points. Ahead of River Plate with their stars. Arguably, the best season of Deportivo Espanol, which is quite a modest club. In the ranks of Buenos Aires… may be a third tier club. That was their time, though, and there is nothing better than a Cinderella story. And signs of the future were present: it was not yet high fashion for players to roll their socks above the knee, so here is an early bird in times when it was fashionable to roll down the socks to the ankles.
Boca Juniors – 2nd with 76 points. Strong season of not a bad team, but they were not a title contender. Compared to River Plate, they appeared weaker, but performed better. Well, if not able to win the title, ate least they finished ahead of the arch-enemy and that was always sweet.
At the end – familiar champion. Independiente (Avallaneda) won the championship with confidence – 84 points. 8 points ahead of Boca Juniors. They won 22 games, lost only 5. Their 11 ties ended with 7 penalty shoot-out wins and 4 losses. Scored 58 goals, allowed 32. Very strong season indeed.
Their squad was perhaps more similar to Boca’s team than to River’s – a bunch of stars, but fewer and not quite as famous as River’s. A slight change of line-up – as the one here – suddenly makes the team rather ordinary on paper. But not on the field!
Standing from left: Pereira, Clausen, Monzón, Delgado, Ríos, Ludueña.
Front: Bianco, Reggiardo, Ubaldi, Bochini, Insúa.
No matter who else was in the team, the greatest name is Richardo Bochini. Already a living legend and evidently eternal… And his status was such that… he can play with different socks than the other players, as the first picture of the champions shows. He spurred Independiente to their 13th title. As a curious note, there was only one Independiente player in the 1990 World Cup Argentine squad and he was not a part of the 1989 champion team.

Argentina II Division

Argentina. Unusual system, which was more complicated in the second level – if the First Division was simple, the Second Division had problems inherited from the past. It was not easy to amalgamate the Province of Buenos Aires with the other provinces in the country. Thus, Second Division was practically the old Buenos Aires Second Division, now including some clubs from other provinces. Promotion and relegation were difficult issue, though – it was felt that some strong clubs from other provinces were left out and because of that only the champion of the Second Division was directly promoted to first level. The second promotion was a play-off tournament between 9 Second Division teams (those placed 2nd to 10th in the final table) plus the winners of Primera B Metropolitana and Zonales Noroestre and Sureste from Torneo del Interior. The winner of this tournament was promoted to First Division. As for relegation, three teams went down (to either Primera B Metropolitana or their respective provincial league) and one more club played promotion/relegation play-off against a team from the regional leagues. Two legs were played only if the first leg was tied or won by the regional candidate, the current Second Division member hosting the first the leg. Argentina used strange relegation system for years and continued to do so: it was not according to final positions in the championship, but by separate relegation table which made average of points divided by number of games in the last 3 seasons. This traditional system as a rule of thumb worked against newcomers to the league – unless such a team had very strong season. There was a new rule this season, part of the drive during the 1980s to invigorate the game in Europe with various experiments, but it was employed only in the First Division.
Second Division – Primera B Nacional. 22 teams in it, standard league championship with 2 points for a win. The last three in the relegation table went down and one more team went to promotion/relegation play-off – but why this particular team is unclear. As already mentioned, 2nd to 10th finishers went to promotion play-off plus 3 more teams to contest the second promotion to Primera Division. Violence was increasingly marking football around the world and Argentina was getting quite a bad case of it: in the 3rd round the match between Central Cordoba and Huracan was suspended in the 83rd minute and later was awarded to Huracan. Chacarita Juniors had 3 points deducted for violence acts and Douglas Haig had 2 points deducted for the same.
Chacarita Juniors finished last with 23 points. In the relegation table they were 20th and thus – relegated.
Temperley – 21st with 26 points. 21st in the relegation table too, so relegated. Second row from left: Medina, Capuzzi, Pereyra, Franchini, Bottari, Legaspi. Crouching: Aguilar, Morrudo, Arana, Seco, Azerrad.
Cipolletti – 20th with 28 points. They out of the relegation zone in the relegation table, so they remained in the league.
Tigre – 19th with 30 points.
Estacion Quequen (Necochea) – 18th with 31 points. And the curse of the newcomer… since they were just promoted to Second Division, they had no previous record in the relegation table and had to depend only on this season – which was brave, but still lowly, and thus their average was the worst in the relegation table. They were relegated.
Douglas Haig – 17th with 32 points.
Los Andes – 16th with 33 points. Standing from left: Justo S. Meza, Néstor Ferraresi, Daniel Bolognese, Enrique José Alvarez, Héctor Franchoni.
First row: C. López, Villafañe, Marcos Castro, Daniel A. Godoy (Uruguayan), Marcelo Ibáñez, Orlando Romero.
Quilmes – 15th with 37 points. Back row from left: Jorge Di Gregorio, Javier Orrego, Emilio Kalujerovich, Ricardo Kergaravat, Alejandro Mulet, Guillermo Escalante.
Front: Ronald Baroni, Omar H. Gómez, Mario Gómez, Jorge Raffo, Hugo Neira.
Deportivo Maipu – 14th with 43 points. Here is the mystery… in the relegation table they were 12th. No reason to be in danger of relegation at all, yet, they were the team which went to the promotion/relegation play-off.
Standing from left: Gazzaniga, Lamolla, Funes, Barrios, Franco, Torletti. Front: Corró, Alberto H. Rodríguez, Escobar, Nocelli, Navarro.
Central Cordoba (Santiago del Estero) – 13th with 43 points.
Banfield – 12th with 44 points.
Atletico Tucuman – 11th with 45 points.
Sportivo Italiano – 10th with 46 points. Going to promotion play-offs.
Talleres (Renedios Escalada) – 9th with 48 points. Going to promotion play-offs.
Standing from left: Tomás Quiroga, Jorge Giles, Sergio Zanetti, Osvaldo Biaín, Alfredo Jáuregui, Pastor Ortiz.
First row: Sergio A. Rodríguez, Adalberto Perroud, Mauricio Caminitti, Rubén Rojas, Carlos P. Cardozo.
Defensa y Jisticia – 8th with 49 points. Going to promotion play-offs.

Belgrano – 7th with 50 points. Going to promotion play-offs.
Colon – 6th with 50 points. Going to promotion play-offs.
Huracan – 5th with 51 points. Going to promotion play-offs.
Second row from left: Héctor Cúper, Oscar Garré, Fernando Quiroz, Gabriel Puentedura, Ramón Brítez, Eugenio Gentile.
Crouching: Carlos Taracido, Antonio Mohamed, Ariel Paolorossi, Walter De Felippe, Gustavo R. Montero.
Almirante Brown – 4th with 51 points. Going to promotion play-offs.
Second row from left: César G. Carrizo, Sergio Rechiutti, Raúl Martini, Ricardo Johansen, Víctor H. Zacharski, Marcelo Golinowski.
Front: Gabriel Pastor, Juan J. Rodríguez, Rodolfo Righi, Víctor H. Meriggi, Eduardo Cristaldo.
Union – 3rd with 52 points. Going to promotion play-offs.
Lanus – 2nd with 53 points. Lost top place by a point. Going to promotion play-offs, but with a bit of luck they would have been champions and directly promoted up.
Chaco For Ever – clinched 1st place with 54 points from 21 wins, 12 ties, 9 losses, and 66-44 goal difference. Dramatic victory, no doubt, but well rewarded – not only champions of Second Division, but directly promoted to Primera – a rare achievement.
Back row from left: Raul Oyola, Juan Arguello, Jorge Benitez, Jose Vilche, Felipe Di Marco, Hugo Parrado.
Front: Luis Sosa, Celso Freyre, Jose Villarreal, Luis Diaz, Juan Sotelo.

Relegation play-off: Deportivo Maipu had to meet Gutierrez Sport Club from the Liga Mendocina de futbol. Unheard of club… Deportivo Maipu benefited by the strange rule for this stage: they hosted the opening leg and won the match. It was just 1-0, but the victory was theirs and no second leg was to be played – Deportivo Maipu remained in Primera B Nacional.
Promotion play-offs. Only on the surface the rules were simple: direct elimination cup-style, in two legs. But 12 teams participated… 9 from Primera B and 3 from lower leagues: Villa Dalmine, the champion of Primera B Metropolitana, and the winners of Zonales Noroestre and Sureste from Torneo Interior – Atletico de Rafaela and Olimpo. Not everybody started from the first round, though – 3rd placed in the Second Division championship – Union – started in the second round and the 2nd placed in the league – Lanus – entered at the semifinals.
First round:
Atletico Rafaela lost to Huracan 3-5 and 1-2. Top row from left: Fertonani, Marino, Querini, Levrino, Berzero, Alfaro. Front: Giordano, Fuentes, López, Bernasconi, Riberi.
Olimpo (Bahia Blanca) was eliminated by Almirante Brown 2-0 and 1-3. Hard to tell why… they scored away goal.
Standing from left: Mercuri, Torres, Quevedo, Cheiles, Oviedo, Ronco. Crouching: Bustos, Schmidt, Paolucci, Mansilla, Palacio.
Villa Dalmine lost to Colon 0-0 and 1-4.
Standing from left: Barrios, Bustos, Tallarico, Latreite, Genaro, Céliz. Front: Urán, Galván, Bartolucci, Labonia, Acuña.
Sportivo Italiano eliminated Belgrano 0-0 and 1-0.
Talleres (Remedios de Escalada) lost to Defensa y Justicia 0-0 and 1-2.
Second round: Union entered the play-offs now.
Colon eliminated Huracan 1-0 and 2-1.
Defensa y Justicia lost to Almirante Brown 0-2 and 1-2.
Sportivo Italiano lost to Union 1-2 and 2-2.
½ finals: Lanus entered.
Almirante Brown was eliminated by Union 0-2 and 0-3.
Lanus eliminated Colon 2-0 and 1-1. Well… they did not – for whatever reason Colon went to the final.
So unlucky… leading at half-season, but lost the title at the end by single point. They won the promotion ½ final against Colon and yet the losers went to the final… unless Lanus was punished for some infractions, there was no reason the winning team to be eliminated.
Final: Colon vs Union. Both teams played top league football before and were eager to climb back to it. Colon had no right to be at the final, so some kind of justice required their opponents to win… and they did: Union won both legs 2-0 and 1-0.
Union (Santa Fe) won the promotion play-offs – or Torneo Reducido – and got promoted. A nice return to top flight.
It was nice for Union (Santa Fe) to earn promotion, but still the champions of Second Division were the best team – once again, Chaco For Ever. Second row from left: Di Marco, Valdéz, Freyre, Ferlatti, Sperandío, Parrado. First row: Cravero, Noremberg, Alfredo Fernández, Luis Sosa, Rosas.
Champions and directly promoted! What a thrill!

Brazil the Cup

Copa do Brasil. So, Brazil had a national cup tournament – on top of everything else. Gremio and Sport reached the final. The first leg in Recife ended scoreless 0-0. In Porto Alegre the hosts managed to extract victory: 2-1.
Sport (Recife) tried hard to win a trophy, but it was not their year… relegation to second level and no remedy with a cup.
Gremio (Porto Alegre) kept strong position in Brazilian football – they were unable to reach the championship final, but still won the Cup.
Well done, but it was somewhat of a last hurrah of a fading team – there best years were already in the past, the current squad was not that great. Still capable of winning, though.

Brazil I Division

Serie A. Format: First Stage
The 22 clubs were divided in 2 groups of 11 teams each, playing against the other teams of their respective groups once. The 8 best placed teams of each group qualified to the Second Stage, while the 3 last placed teams of each group competed in the Relegation Tournament.
Second Stage
The 16 qualified clubs were divided in two groups of 8 teams each, playing once against the other group teams. The points of this stage and of the first stage were summed. The champion of each group qualified to the final.
Relegation Tournament
The 6 clubs eliminated in the First Stage played against each other twice. The 4 last placed teams were relegated to the following year’s Série B.
Final
It was played between the champions of the two Second Stage groups. The two clubs played a maximum of 2 matches, but the club with the best performance in the competition had the option to choose where the first match would be played, and also need only two points (one victory or two draws) to be declared as the competition champions.
First stage:
Group A
Team
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Pts
Qualification
Corinthians
10
6
2
2
11
6
+5
14
Second Stage
Botafogo
10
4
3
3
10
8
+2
11

Atlético Mineiro
10
3
5
2
13
8
+5
11

Náutico
10
4
2
4
16
16
0
10

Internacional-SP
10
3
4
3
8
8
0
10

Flamengo
10
3
4
3
6
7
−1
10

São Paulo
10
2
6
2
11
11
0
10

Internacional-RS
10
3
3
4
6
6
0
9

Guarani
10
3
3
4
7
8
−1
9
Relegation Tournament
Atlético-PR
10
2
5
3
9
10
−1
9

Vitória
10
2
3
5
4
13
−9
7

Group B
Team
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Pts
Qualification
Palmeiras
10
6
2
2
13
5
+8
14
Second Stage
Vasco
10
5
4
1
14
7
+7
14

Portuguesa
10
3
5
2
12
7
+5
11

Grêmio
10
4
2
4
11
11
0
10

Goiás
10
4
2
4
10
12
−2
10

Fluminense
10
4
2
4
9
10
−1
10

Cruzeiro
10
3
4
3
8
8
0
10

Santos
10
2
5
3
6
7
−1
9

Sport
10
3
2
5
9
12
−3
8
Relegation Tournament
Bahia
10
1
3
6
9
17
−8
5

Coritiba
10
3
3
4
10
15
−5
4[a]

Coritiba forfeited the match against Santos, thus was punished with a 1-0 defeat, plus the loss of 5 points and the elimination of the competition.
Relegation tournament
Team
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Pts
Relegation
Vitória
8
4
2
2
10
7
+3
10

Bahia
8
3
4
1
6
5
+1
10

Atlético-PR
8
2
6
0
9
3
+6
10
Relegated to Série B 1990
Guarani
8
2
3
3
8
10
−2
7

Sport
8
0
3
5
3
11
−8
3

Coritiba
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Vitoria – remained in Serie A
Bahia – remained in Serie A
Atletico Paranaense – relegated
Guarani – relegated
Sport – relegated
Coritiba – relegated. Did not play in the relegation tournament.

Serie A – complition.
Second stage
Group A
Team
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Pts
Qualification
São Paulo
18
7
9
2
25
15
+10
23
Qualified to the final
Botafogo
18
9
4
5
20
16
+4
22

Corinthians
18
8
5
5
15
13
+2
21

Atlético Mineiro
18
6
7
5
21
13
+8
19

Flamengo
18
6
7
5
16
13
+3
19

Náutico
18
5
5
8
27
34
−7
15

Internacional-SP
18
4
7
7
13
19
−6
15

Internacional-RS
18
4
5
9
14
19
−5
13

Group B
Team
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Pts
Qualification
Vasco
18
8
8
2
26
16
+10
24
Qualified for the final
Cruzeiro
18
9
5
4
23
14
+9
23

Palmeiras
18
8
6
4
21
13
+8
22

Portuguesa
18
7
6
5
21
13
+8
20

Goiás
18
6
6
6
17
21
−4
18

Grêmio
18
6
5
7
19
19
0
17

Santos
18
5
6
7
13
16
−3
16

Fluminense
18
5
4
9
15
25
−10
14

Final:
Sao Paulo 0-1 Vasco da Gama
Morumbi, São Paulo
Attendance: 71,552
Referee: Wilson Carlos dos Santos
Goal: Sorato, 50 minute.
São Paulo: Gilmar; Netinho, Adílson, Ricardo Rocha and Nelsinho; Flávio, Bobô and Raí; Mário Tilico, Ney and Edivaldo (Paulo César). Head coach: Carlos Alberto Silva.
Vasco: Acácio; Luiz Carlos Winck, Quiñónez, Marco Aurélio and Mazinho; Zé do Carmo, Marco Antônio Boiadeiro and Bismarck; Sorato, Bebeto and William. Head coach: Nelsinho Rosa.
The second leg of the final was not played as Vasco had a better season record and won the first leg.
Participants by final standings – the last 6 already mentioned.
16 – Internacional (Limeira)
15 – Fluminense. Standing from left: Carlos André, Donizete, Rangel, Ricardo Pinto, Torres, Edgar;
Crouching: Fernando Cruz, Marcio Luiz, Hélio Fominha, Vander Luiz, Marquinho
14 – Internacional (Porto Alegre)
13- Nautico. Standing from left: Mauri, Lúcio, Ronilson, Levi, Muller, Junior.

Front: Newton, Marcão, Bizu, Aroldo, Augusto.
12 – Santos
11 – Gremio
10 – Goias
9 – Flamengo
8 – Atletico Mineiro
7 – Portuguesa.
6 – Corinthians
5 – Palmeiras
4 – Botafogo
3 – Cruzeiro. Possible photo of a 1989 eleven.
2 – Sao Paulo. Standing from left: Adilson, Gilmar, Vizolli, Ricardo Rocha, Nelsinho, Zé Teodoro. First row: Hélio Santos (masseur), Mário Tilico, Bobô, Ney Bala, Raí, Edivaldo.
Came close to the title, but was unable to win it.
And the champions: Vasco da Gama. Well deserved triumph of nice squad.
Great season of a squad bursting with talent. The most detectable feature of these players was their age – they were young! Most likely that was the ‘great secret’: Flamengo, coached by Tele Santana, was impressive on paper, may be even more impressive than Vasco, but it was aging team with aging coach – tired and may be tactically outdated. Vasco was current team and they won. After 15 years Vasco da Gama won its 2nd Brazilian title.

Brazil II Division

Brazil. If Colombia sunk into scandalous disorder, Brazil went the other way – after years of chaos, finally order was shaping in. It was a good year – the national team won Copa America at last and there was crop of bright young stars. True, the best players were players in Europe and the exodus was only increasing. It could be that in 1989 the scales finally tipped in favour of the national championship – no more good play in the state championship provided a spot in the top level national championship, thus changing the focus of both clubs and fans. The top national level was reduced from 24 to 22 teams and the last 4 were to be relegated to the second level. There was further reduction to 20 teams, so only 2 teams were promoted from second level. The top level was becoming a real league, soon to play classic league championship as well. The second level was shakier – 24 teams played in it in 1988, but in 1989 the number increased to 96! Second level was still in transitional period – the first order was to stabilize top league, Second Division after that, naturally suffering at the moment. But something was firm: promotion/relegation exchange was established and the top 2 teams were promoted to First Division. However, it was enormously huge and complicated championship this year and even simplification of the championship formula did not help grasping the stages of the season. First level was structured better already. Taming local pride, ambitions, and illusions was never easy in Brazil, but now these problems were ate least removed from the top level – and, for the moment, concentrated in the second level. It was obvious that some team from the Amazonian jungle was inferior even to third-rate teams from Sao Paulo or Rio de Janeiro, but such a club was located in a state, which demanded equality – if Rio should have 5 teams in the national championship, so the jungle state should have the same number . Thus, obscure clubs popped up, mostly to play their single season in the second national level.
Campeonato Brasileiro Série B 1989, the second level of Brazilian National League, was played from September 9 to December 20, 1989. The competition had 96 clubs and two of them were promoted to Série A. The participants were divided into 16 groups of 6 teams in the opening stage. The top 2 teams in each group continued to the next round – from there to the final it was cup-style direct elimination, thus, 1/16, 1/8/ ¼. Semifinals, and final. Many obscure teams played their single season on that high national level. The formula was simple, but the sheer size of the championship… and the obscurity of most teams, combined with similar names of clubs from different states made it both exciting and difficult to follow.
Group A

1
Rio Branco
10
6
0
4
11
10
+1
12
2
Rio Negro
10
5
2
3
9
3
+6
12
3
Nacional
10
4
3
3
9
5
+4
11
4
Dom Bosco
10
5
0
5
13
11
+2
10
5
Mixto
10
4
0
6
9
13
−4
8
6
Princesa do Solimões
10
3
1
6
12
21
−9
7
Mixto
Group B

1
Anapolina
10
6
1
3
15
10
+5
13
2
Ceilândia
10
5
2
3
11
9
+2
12
3
Sobradinho
10
4
1
5
11
16
−5
9
4
Vila Nova
10
3
3
4
12
11
+1
9
5
Taguatinga
10
3
3
4
12
13
−1
9
6
Atlético
10
3
2
5
11
13
−2
8
Vila Nova

Taguatinga
Atletico Goianiense
Group C

1
Moto Clube
10
5
4
1
17
7
+10
14
2
Remo
10
5
3
2
11
7
+4
13
3
Paysandu
10
4
4
2
10
6
+4
12
4
Maranhão
10
2
4
4
11
17
−6
8
5
Sampaio Corrêa
10
2
3
5
6
13
−7
7
6
Tuna Luso
10
1
4
5
7
12
−5
6
MAC – Maranhao Atletico Clube
Group D

1
Fortaleza
10
4
5
1
9
5
+4
13
2
Ceará
10
4
4
2
9
6
+3
12
3
Flamengo
10
4
4
2
11
10
+1
12
4
River
10
4
3
3
8
8
0
11
5
Ferroviário
10
3
2
5
9
10
−1
8
6
4 de Julho
10
1
2
7
10
17
−7
4
Ferroviario
River
Group E

1
ABC
10
5
4
1
10
4
+6
14
2
Treze
10
3
6
1
12
6
+6
12
3
América
10
4
3
3
13
11
+2
11
4
Nacional de Patos
10
4
2
4
11
13
−2
10
5
Botafogo
10
3
1
6
9
14
−5
7
6
Baraúnas
10
1
4
5
4
11
−7
6
America (Natal)
Group F

1
Central
10
7
3
0
14
3
+11
17
2
Santa Cruz
10
6
3
1
14
2
+12
15
3
CRB
10
4
4
2
9
5
+4
12
4
Capelense
10
2
4
4
7
8
−1
8
5
CSA
10
3
1
6
5
14
−9
7
6
América
10
0
1
9
2
19
−17
1
CSA
Group G

1
Catuense
10
5
4
1
12
4
+8
14
2
Confiança
10
4
5
1
11
5
+6
13
3
Fluminense de Feira
10
3
6
1
8
6
+2
12
4
Leônico
10
3
3
4
7
8
−1
9
5
Sergipe
10
1
6
3
6
9
−3
8
6
Lagarto
10
0
4
6
2
14
−12
4
Sergipe
Fluminense de Feira
Group H

1
Itaperuna
10
5
4
1
11
4
+7
14
2
Americano
10
5
3
2
14
5
+9
13
3
AA Cabofriense
10
4
3
3
9
9
0
11
4
Rio Branco
10
3
5
2
9
5
+4
11
5
Desportiva
10
3
1
6
7
17
−10
7
6
Colatina
10
1
2
7
7
17
−10
4
Cabofriense
Desportiva
Colatina
Group I

1
Botafogo
10
5
3
2
9
7
+2
13
2
Catanduvense
10
4
5
1
11
5
+6
13
3
Uberlândia
10
2
5
3
8
9
−1
9
4
Goiatuba
10
1
7
2
3
4
−1
9
5
Goiânia
10
3
2
5
10
14
−4
8
6
América
10
1
6
3
3
5
−2
8
Goiatuba
Goiania
Group J

1
Bragantino
10
8
2
0
17
3
+14
18
2
São José
10
3
4
3
6
6
0
10
3
Volta Redonda
10
3
4
3
6
13
−7
10
4
Novorizontino
10
2
5
3
9
7
+2
9
5
Esportivo
10
2
3
5
2
7
−5
7
6
Santo André
10
2
2
6
7
11
−4
6
Novorizontino
Esportivo (Passos)
Group L

1
América
10
5
3
2
15
10
+5
13
2
União São João
10
4
3
3
13
9
+4
11
3
Democrata-SL
10
4
3
3
12
16
−4
11
4
Bangu
10
4
2
4
12
12
0
10
5
Valeriodoce
10
3
2
5
9
10
−1
8
6
Tupi
10
2
3
5
7
11
−4
7
Tupi
Bangu
Group M

1
Juventus
10
4
6
0
13
7
+6
14
2
XV de Piracicaba
10
4
4
2
9
6
+3
12
3
Rio Branco
10
4
4
2
9
9
0
12
4
Mogi Mirim
10
2
5
3
7
11
−4
9
5
América
10
2
3
5
9
9
0
7
6
Ponte Preta
10
2
2
6
7
12
−5
6
Ponte Preta
Group N

1
Grêmio Maringá
10
6
3
1
13
7
+6
15
2
Londrina
10
5
2
3
8
5
+3
12
3
Operário
10
3
5
2
14
11
+3
11
4
Douradense
10
2
4
4
7
11
−4
8
5
Ubiratan
10
2
4
4
9
14
−5
8
6
União Rondonópolis
10
1
4
5
4
7
−3
6
Operario (Campo Grande)
Group O

1
Blumenau
10
6
3
1
10
5
+5
15
2
Juventude
10
5
2
3
14
10
+4
12
3
Brusque
10
5
2
3
16
14
+2
12
4
Glória
10
4
4
2
13
9
+4
12
5
Marcílio Dias
10
3
1
6
11
15
−4
7
6
Esportivo
10
0
2
8
5
16
−11
2
Gloria
Marcilio Dias
Esportivo (Bento Goncalves)
Group P

1
Joinville
10
6
2
2
9
2
+7
14
2
Operário
10
4
5
1
10
5
+5
13
3
Noroeste
10
3
4
3
7
5
+2
10
4
Foz do Iguaçu
10
3
4
3
7
9
−2
10
5
Caxias
10
2
4
4
4
7
−3
8
6
Pinheiros
10
1
3
6
4
13
−9
5
Caxias
Pinheiros
Group Q

1
Criciúma
10
5
4
1
22
8
+14
14
2
Figueirense
10
4
4
2
8
10
−2
12
3
Novo Hamburgo
10
2
6
2
6
6
0
10
4
Santa Cruz
10
2
5
3
13
15
−2
9
5
Pelotas
10
2
4
4
6
11
−5
8
6
Avaí
10
2
3
5
8
13
−5
7

Second phase to the final:

Rio Negro
2–2 (p. 3–2)
Anapolina[3]
1–1
1–1
Ceilândia
0–1
Rio Branco-AC
0–0
0–1
Fortaleza
0–2
Remo
0–0
0–2
Ceará
2–2 (p. 5–4)
Moto Clube
1–1
1–1
ABC
1–5
Central
1–4
0–1
Treze
2–2 (a)
Santa Cruz
0–0
2–2
Confiança
1–2
Itaperuna
0–0
1–2
Americano
2–2 (a)
Catuense
1–2
1–0
São José
1–0
Botafogo-SP
1–0
0–0
Catanduvense
1–2
Bragantino
0–1
1–1
XV de Piracicaba
1–0
América-RJ
1–0
0–0
União São João
1–2
Juventus
1–0
0–2
Operário-PR
3–2
Grêmio Maringá
2–0
1–2
Londrina
1–2
Joinville
1–1
0–1
Figueirense
2–5
Juventude
0–2
2–3
Blumenau
1–1 (p. 2–4)
Criciúma
1–0
0–1
Eliminated:
Londrina
ABC (Natal)
Americano (Campos)
Moto Club – or Moto Clube (Sao Luis)
Botafogo (Ribeirao Preto)
Rio Negro (Manaus)
Uniao (Sao Joao)
1/8

Remo
1–0
Anapolina
1–0
0–0
Ceará
4–0
Rio Branco-AC
3–0
1–0
Catuense
2–2 (a)
Central
1–0
1–2
Treze
2–2 (a)
Itaperuna
2–2
0–0
São José
1–1 (a)
XV de Piracicaba
0–0
1–1
Juventus
2–4
Bragantino
0–1
2–3
Operário-PR
3–3 (a)
Juventude
2–2
1–1
Criciúma
2–1
Joinville
2–1
0–0
Eliminated:
Anapolina
Central
Juventus (Mooca)
Treze
Operario (Ponte Grossa)
Rio Branco
XV de Novembre (Piracicaba) – also known as XV de Piracicaba
¼

Ceará
1–2
Catuense
1–1
0–1
Itaperuna
1–2
Remo
0–0
1–2
São José
0–0 (p. 6–5)
Juventude
0–0
0–0
Criciúma
1–3
Bragantino
1–0
0–3
Eliminated:
Ceara
Itaperuna
Criciuma
½
Remo lost to Bragantino 0-0, 0-0, and 1-4 in the penalty shootout.
Catuense was eliminated by Sao Jose 1-1 and 0-1.
Finals – so far the semifinals winners earned promotion to First Level and they played 2 legs to decide the Second Level champion. At home Sao Jose lost 0-1 and they also lost the second leg 1-2. Bragantino won the championship.

 

Sao Jose (Sao Jose de Campos) lost the final, but had excellent season and earned promotion to the top Brazilian level – quite an achievement for a small club.

Bragantino (Braganca Paulista) won the championship.
The champions were happy, of course: it was not often Bragantino won a trophy. As for the team, it is hard to tell how good they were, since transfers in Brazil were frequent. The emblematic Biro-Biro played at least in the finals, but he also played for first-level team this very year.

Colombia

Colombia. International success and fame, yes, but Colombian football sunk also to shameful disgrace this year.
At October 1st, 1989, the referee Arturo Ortega was gunned down after officiating in Medellin a scoreless draw between Deportivo Independiente and America (Cali). Soon after the murder a journalist received an anonymous call from a man claiming to be one of the killers, who said ‘we and our patrons lost a lot of money’, blaming Ortega for the result of the match. The murder of Ortega was the last drop in the already dark reality of Colombia, football included, and the championship was canceled. At the moment 318 games were played and the championship was in the second phase, but it was canceled entirely – no champion, no any kind of final standing. To a point, it was a revolt against the narco-cartels and it was also without much significance. Seven clubs were run by narco-cartels at the time: Atletico Nacional and Deportivo Independiente (Medellin), America (Cali), Millonarios (Bogota), Independiente (Santa Fe), Union (Magdalena), and Deportivo (Pereira). It was hardly a secret… and football mirrored the grim Colombian reality: the country divided by narco-cartels with their influence, practices, and rivalries – a match between Deportivo Independiente and America was more than a football rivalry, but also a battle between narco-cartels not only for the title and it was impossible to tell what exactly was at stake: was it a war between cartels for bigger shares of the drug market or clash of egos? Most likely both, but there was another element equally strong: betting. The same people who were ready to do anything to put their team on top also bet money (legally and illegally) on the outcomes of games and when big money was to be won egos suddenly were not all that important – at least for a moment. In the eyes of Medellin’s fans (and not only theirs), Ortega unfairly favoured America in his last match. He was ‘guilty’… but was he? Was it just bad refereeing or was he controlled by the owners of America? Of course, the notorious Medellin cartel led by larger than life Pablo Escobar was blamed and most certainly he was behind the murder, yet… there were layers and layers so difficult to peel and reach definite truth. Criminals were involved in sports for a long time all around the world – there were money in sports. Money to be made and money to be cleaned – one of the most important reasons for drug cartels to get involved with football was because it provided easy way to launder money. There were also egos – the ‘big boss’ must be first in anything. And most drug lords were genuine fans of football and their teams too… Pablo Escobar was all of that and he was also the most flamboyant and controversial drug lord. He was uncharacteristically emotional watching the penalty shoot-out of Copa Libertadores final at the stands and cheering Atletico Nacional’s victory, according to his long-time bodyguard. Atletico Nacional’s triumph was his own doing – he not only made his beloved club strong, but treated players as friends. But he also took control of Atletico Nacional rival Deportivo Independiente (DIM) and was often seen at the stadium watching their games. Friends are friends, but… Escobar often invited rival drug lords to party and play private games – ‘come around, bring the best players you chose and let see who will win’. And bet on the outcome… There was no player-friend capable or refusing a call for private play from the boss… even Maradona flew to play for Escobar and that when the drug lord was in prison – Maradona always claims he had no idea why he had to fly to Colombia and who Escobar was, just going for the money offered and very much surprised to play a game in a prison. If only he knew, he would, naturally, have refused… but unfortunately he did not know. Right… at the time when Maradona was snorting cocaine like there was no tomorrow he had no idea where cocaine comes from and who was running it and was in the news almost daily. Friendlies and some man-to-man betting around the barbecue is one thing, winning a championship – quite another for the same protagonists. One could lose a few hundred thousands with a smile to a ‘buddy’ at home, but that thousands and more have to be legalized or just come back through official games and fixed betting on larger scale – and here there are no buddies. In general, Escobar was the most brutal among the drug lords – others preferred bribes to murder – but it was a small distinction. A few years later Andres Escobar, the great defender of Atletico Nacional was killed, presumably for his ‘shameful’ performance at the 1994 World Cup, but he was the only player among the Colombian stars uncomfortable with and quite openly critical to drug money – which effectively meant standing against his own boss Pablo Escobar. Escobar was ruthless, yet, he was also a saint even now to many in Medellin – he built housing and schools to the poor (and, to a point, it was genuine concern for bettering their lives). He gave them also a great team – and this was even patriotic, for to a large degree he was responsible for elevating Colombian national team to a world-class power. Except Andres Escobar all Colombian stars of the time, coach Maturana included, praise Pablo. Then again, almost all of them played for Atletico Nacional and personally benefited by ‘friendship’ with the drug lord. Escobar really loved football, that was sure. It was also a deadly love… Alvaro Ortega went against Medellin on two accounts: ‘robing’ DIM from a possible victory and thus robing Atletico Nacional as well in the battle against America (Cali). He had to die.. again, for two reasons (not counting the hint of lost money from betting): the usual fan’s anger at the real or imagined ‘crooked’ referee supporting the enemy and also a referee appearing to be in the crutches of a deadly rival (Cali drug cartel). Football became a part of the war between the war between Colombian government and the drug lords and there are doubts that even today the game is clean from drug money and influence. But in 1989 the championship was canceled – the scandal was too big, the crime too much. And because of that only photos of teams will be given – for the teams existed and played more than half of the season.
Once Caldas
Deportivo (Cali)
Atletico (Bucaramanga)
Deportivo (Cucuta). Standing from left: Chepe Torres, Pedro Nel Barbosa, Antonio ‘el gringo’ Palacios, Willian Mosquera, Luis Carlos ‘el panameño’ Sánchez, Carlos Mario Estrada  .
Crouching: Juán Bautista Sanclemente, Raúl Humberto Mora, Juán Carlos Gutiérrez, Hernán Alzate, Danilo Robledo.
Atletico Junior
Deportes (Tolima)
Those were the ‘clean’ teams – may be true, may be not… And now the teams definitely belonging to the drug cartels:
Atletico Nacional (Medellin). Top row from left: Miguel Alfredo Nuñez, José Fernando “Chepe” Castañeda, José René Higuita Zapata, Hernán Torres Oliveros.
Forth row: Luis Carlos “Coroncoro” Perea, Juan Jairo “El Andino de oro” Galeano Restrepo, Jhon Jairo “La Turbina” Tréllez Valencia, Héctor Cortina Maestre, Albeiro “Palomo” Usuriaga(QEPD), Andrés “Seguridad” Escobar Saldarriaga (QEPD), Giovanis Cassiani Gómez, John Mario “Canino” Caicedo, Víctor Emilio Luna Gómez.
Third row: Hernán Jairo Luna Villamil (MD), Jhon Jairo “Maravillita” Carmona Rios, Gildardo Biderman Gómez Monsalve, Elkin Javier Sánchez Vásquez (PF), Nelson De Jesús Gallego Dautt(AT), Diego Alonso Barragán Rodríguez (PF), Hernán Darío “Bolillo” Gómez Jaramillo (AT), Francisco Antonio”Pacho” Maturana García (DT), Luis Fernando Suárez Guzmán(AT), Leonel De Jesús Álvarez Zuleta, Didí Alex Valderrama Pinedo, Wiston Tobón Ochoa (MD).
Second row: Jairo Grisales (KIN-QEPD), Jaime De Jesús”Jimmy” Arango Estrada, Alexis Enrique”El Maestro” García Vega, José Ricardo “Chicho” Pérez Morales,Luis Alfonso “El Bendito” Fajardo Posada, Jhon Jairo “Rata” Restrepo Toro (KIN), Francisco “Tara” Jaramillo (UT), Niver Arboleda (QEPD), Luis Fernando “Chonto” Herrera Arango, Víctor Manuel Zuñiga, Jorge Carmona Rios (QEPD), Ramón Elías “Ticho” Pabón (UT).
Front: Hernán Gustavo Arboleda, José Fernando Santa, Óscar “Galea” Galeano, José Durán, Iván Darío”Chumi” Castañeda Zapata, León Fernando “Pollo” Villa Arango, Gustavo Adolfo”Mísil”Restrepo Vásquez, Jaime Sierra Porras, Carlos Mario Maturana García, Víctor Hugo Marulanda Velásquez.
Well, this is the ‘primary’ club belonging to Pablo Escobar and the team with the great Colombian stars famous around the world, almost the whole national team plus coach Maturana and the brother of Carlos Valderama – Didi, by now an aging star. On top of the world at the moment, but not leading in the domestic championship, which certainly brought frustration to both ordinary fans and Pablo Escobar.
DIM – as usually is written and called Deportivo Independiente (Medellin) in Colombia. Technically, their match against America brought ‘the revenge’ on the referee Ortega. Pablo Escobar was certainly ‘something else’ – he was the only drug lord owning two teams and supporting physically both. Yet, his major love was Atletico Nacional – DIM had a strong team, but nothing like the star-studded Atletico Nacional. It also serves as an example to question a claim often made in Colombia: that drug lords benefited the development of football by bringing top foreign talent. First, Colombian clubs imported great foreigners from the first day they created the professional league, so it was nothing new. Second, the drug lords did not hire the best foreigners even when the poured enormous money into their clubs – as the foreigners playing for DIM testify: Juan Carlos Letelier (Chile) and Jorge Jara (Paraguay) are not world-class stars. No matter what, Colombians could not compete with European clubs when it came to great stars – the reasons for that are not only monetary, of course.
Deportivo (Pereira)
The last four of the cartel-owed clubs were the leading teams when the championship was canceled:
Millonarios finished 2nd in the Torneo Apertura with 38 points. Standing from left: Sergio Goycochea, Luis Manuel Quiñones, Cerveleón Cuesta, Wilman Conde, Eduardo Pimentel. First row: Carlos Enrique “Gambeta” Estrada, Jair Abonía, Oscar “Pajaro” Juárez, Hugo Galeano, Alberto Gamero, John Jairo “Pocillo” Díaz.
America (Cali) won Torneo Apertura with 44 points. As the text shows, drug lords running the club did not banish them from playing in the USA. Then again, their owners kept lower public profile than Pablo Escobar and were more ‘refined’ – preferred bribes to gunning down referees.
Union (Magdalena) – was 2nd in Copa Colombia. The Argentine-born goalkeeper of national team Bolivia Carlos Trucco was the most recognizable player in the squad.
Independiente (Santa Fe) was leading the Copa Colombia stage when the championship was cancelled. Standing from left: Adolfo Valencia, Freddy Rincón, Manuel Rincón, Miller Cuesta, José Romeiro Hurtado, Fernando Hernández. First row: John Edison Álvarez, William “El Palmero” Morales, Héctor Ramón “El Rambo” Sossa, Sergio Vargas, Germán Morales
To a point, those Colombian stars who were not playing for Atletico Nacional were with Independiente.
Well, that was the bitter end of otherwise great year for Colombian football.

Copa Libertadores

Copa Libertadores. New formula was introduced this year – the tournament started with its 5 preliminary groups of 4 teams as ever, but the top 3 in each group qualified to the next stage. Next were the 1/8 finals and so on to the final. The 15 teams qualified in the first stage were joined by the 1988 Cup holder in the 1/8 finals. The change was not so great since only 5 teams were eliminated in the first stage, but on the other hand finally there were more games to be played – and watched – and the real thrill of direct eliminations all the way to the final. The final itself was slightly changed as well – the 2 legs remained, but in case of a tie there was third match on neutral ground, but penalty shoot-out. The first stage practically provided no surprises – perhaps Colo-Colo disappointed, but they played in the toughest Group 1 (Paraguay and Chile). Colo-Colo finished last only because of a goal less they scored compared to Olimpia (Asuncion). The new formula, it turned out, benefited teams which were not all that strong at first – neither of the this year finalists ended on top of their groups and in the previous years the first stage would have been the end for them – but not now. The other early eliminated teams were Sport Maritimo (Group 2, Venezuela), Emelec (Group 3, Ecuador), Sporting Cristal (Group 4, Peru), and The Strongest (Group 5, Bolivia). Boca Juniors and Racing Club finished with equal points – 7 each – in Group 4 and Boca was placed 1st on better goal-difference. Millonarios (Columbia) was the best in the first stage: they finished unbeaten with 10 points in Group 3. Bahia (Brazil) also finished unbeaten with 10 points in Group 2, but Millonarios had 12-3 goal-difference. They were the team scoring most goals and also receiving the least in the group stage.
In the 1/8 finals there was a bit of bad luck – Penarol (Uruguay) faced Internacional (Brazil). Instead of tough battle and penalty shoot-out, everything finished in the first leg in Porto Alegre, where Inter destroyed Penarol 6-2. For a good measure Inter won in Montevideo too – 2-1. Meantime Millonarios struggled against Bolivian Bolivar and prevailed only in the penalty shoot-out. Olimpia (Asuncion) made a minor surprise – having difficulties in the first stage and practically lucky to go ahead, now they eliminated Boca Juniors and that in Buenos Aires: Olimpia won 2-0 at home and then somewhat survived Boca’s assault – 3-5 – which brought them to the penalty shoot-out. It was long affair, which ended in Paraguayan favour 7-6. One more duel ended with penalty shoot-out: Sol de America (Paraguay) managed to get the upper hand over UA Tachira (Venezuela): 3-2. At the same time Atletico Nacional cut off the hopes of Racing Club (Argentina, with Ubaldo Fillol, Ruben Paz, Julio Olarticoechea and Ramon Medina Bello, coached by Alfio Basile) and the Montevideo derby ended with the elimination of Nacional by Danubio, a surprise of a kind.
In the ¼ finals Danubio continued to excite – they eliminated Cobreloa (Chile, beating them twice. The other three pairs were domestic clashes: Inter won over Bahia 1-0 and 0-0, Atletico Nacional prevailed over Millonarios 1-0 and 1-1 and Olimpia did not disappointed againt Sol de America – 2-0 and 4-4. The second leg was a fiesta of goals, which is always great for the fans.
In the ½ finals Danubio was finished. At home they managed 0-0 against Atletico Nacional, but in Colombia they were destroyed 0-6. The other semifinal was tougher – first Internacional won in Asuncion 1-0, but contrary to expectations Olimpia prevailed in Porto Alegre 3-2 and penalty shoot-out followed. The whole city was grieving after that – Olimpia won the shoot-out 5-3. And thus the unlikely finalists emerged: Atletico Nacional and Olimpia. Under the old structure of Copa Libertadores neither team would be finalist and for the first time in the history of the Cup the finalists were not group winners in the first stage.
Atletico Nacional reached the final for the first time, but Olimpia already won Copa Libertadores in 1979. Naturally, both finalists were highly motivated to win the trophy.
The first leg in Asuncion gave comfortable advantage to the hosts.
Olimpia scored twice. The lead was highly encouraging.

Olimpia had high hopes, because not only they went to Colombia with good lead, but also because the second leg was not played in Meddelin. The rules required a venue holding at least 50 000 and there was no such stadium in Meddelin, so the second leg had to be played in Bogota. In theory, the crowd there would be if not hostile, at least cool to Atletico Nacional.

But Colombian fans turned out to be mainly patriotic and enthusiastically supported Atletico Nacional, which was determined to win.
The advantage of Olimpia was neutralized.

The hosts equalized the result in the 65th minute and the match ended 2-0 Atletico Nacional. Penalty shoot-out followed and the public was kept on tiptoes for a long time.
The shoot-out started with immediate advantage to the hosts: in the duel of the goalkeepers, the Uruguayan-born Paraguayan national team goalkeeper Ever Hugo Almeida was beaten by flamboyant Rene Higuita in the first penalty. But it took 18 shoots altogether before there was a winner and if at first penalties were scored, eventually there were more and more misses.
And after Sanabria missed the net, Leonel Alvarez stepped in and scored. To the frenzied delight of the crowd Atletico Nacional won. 5-4.

Luis Carlos Perea received Copa Libertadores
It was wonderful moment of triumph.
Everybody deserved to hold the Cup.
Coach Francisco Maturana most of all.
Olimpia (Asuncion) lost its opportunity to win a second Copa Libertadores. Standing from left: Ever Almeida, Roberto Krausemann, Herib Chamas, Jorge Guasch, Gustavo Benítez, Fidel Miño.
Front: Rafael Bobadilla, Carlos Vidal Sanabria, Raúl Amarilla, Gustavo Neffa, Alfredo Mendoza. This is not a picture from the final, but from the battle against Sol de America much earlier, yet, Olimpia had a stable line, so the same players appeared in the final. Their Uruguyan coach Luis Cubilla did wonders rebuilding the team without losing its strength – only Jorge Guasch remained from the heroes winning Copa Libertadores 10 years earlier. Around him were young players now and only one import: the Argentine defender Roberto Krausemann. Ever Almeida was born in Uruguay, but by now he had Paraguayan citizenship and played for the national team. Given the limited resources of Paraguay, Olimpia made a very good team, thanks to Luis Cubilla and the dedication of the young players. Jorge Guasch was very proud of his teammates and pointed out that the offensive stile Cubilla employed was the key for their success – to a large degree, their style pleased South American crowds and Olimpia practically played as a home team everywhere. Did not work in Bogota, unfortunately, but there was always the next year.
This was the heroic line in Bogota, but photos of the Copa Libertadores winners around the world favoured the losing side of the first final leg.
In general, this is the most popular photo of the winners – a picture not from any final leg. Suarez, Galeano, and Villa did not play at the finals. But never mind – there are much more important things about the fresh conquer of Copa Libertadores. For the first time Colombian team won the trophy, a historic victory. It was the 4th attempt of Colombian team to win, but Atleitico Nacional reached the final for the first time and instantly won – thus, they came above America (Cali), which lost 3 consecutive finals. In local terms, the team from Medellin became more successful than famous rivals America (Cali, rightly the strongest Colombian club for a long time) and Millonarios (Bogota). That is, provincials topped the Colombian more important clubs and cities. And in quit unusual manner too: as rule of thumb, strong Colombian teams depended largely on foreign players and coaches – Atletico Nacional had Colombian coach and only Colombian players. Francisco Maturana was rapidly becoming world-wide famous and so were his players. Almost the whole squad were current Colombian national team players, which were coming to maturity – winning Copa Libertadores not only boosted confidence, but also propelled the national team to previously unreachable heights. Maturana is to be praised for building this squad and players like Hiquita, Escobar, Alvarez as well for their loyalty to club and coach, but there was something else, another side.
Did Pablo Escobar attended the final? At least in Bogota, if not in Asuncion? He was more than a fan – it was hardly a secret that he and the Medellin Cartel financed Atletico Nacional. The cocaine lord and his sinister ways were big trouble already – yes, he supported the poor in Medellin, he cared for football, and probably without drug money Atletico Nacional would not became great, but was the loyalty of coach and players real? Or fear kept them together and in Medellin? Under normal circumstances it was more than likely the stars would join bigger and more successful clubs. But it is academic – the fact is Maturana and the boys were playing with green and white to the delight of Medellin, Pablo Escobar included. The new fame also opened other avenues for the protagonists – Maturana became coach of the Colombian national team, some of the players moved to Europe right after conquering South America (perhaps those were the wisest – a few years later Andres Escobar will be killed by displeased mafia). To a point, Pablo Escobar and the Medellin Cartel masterminded Atletico Nacional’s success and such ‘benefactors’ are always whimsical and lethal. That was behind the scene – on the field strong, hungry and quite delightful team really put Colombian football on the world map. At last.
So, here are the heroes once again – they had no way to prove how good really were at home this season, thanks again to Pablo Escobar and his buddies.

Intercontinental Cup

The Intercontinental Cup was played in Tokyo on December 17, 1989. AC Milan against Atletico Nacional. Both newcomers for the Japanese public.
Tradition suggested Italian victory. The Colombians were feeling cold, they were quite unknown internationally, even accidental, so famous Milan full of world-class stars should have no trouble beating Atletico Nacional even without Gullit.
But the intercontinental clash had its own tradition… and no matter how good an European team at the moment, their South American opponents were even or better.
This clash was no exception.
Atletico Medelin not only neutralized mighty Milan, but looked more dangerous.
The Colombians fought by every legal or illegal mean and Milan suffered, even its best players unable to prevail and finding themselves often tackled down.
Somehow the underdog managed to stay in the game and nobody scored a goal. The regular time ended 0-0.
Call it determination, call it pure luck, call it typical Italian football… it was at the very end of the extra time, when penalty shoot-out seemed sure, when Milan got a free kick and the substitute Evani was chosen to try his luck.
He managed to curve the ball around the wall and in the net. 1-0 in the 119th minute.
There was no time for anything else, it was victory!
Tokyo, National Stadium
December 17, 1989 Att: 60,228 Ref: Fredriksson (SWE)

Milan AC (ITA) 1-0 (0-0) aet Atl. Nacional Medellín (COL)
1-0 119′ Evani

AC Milan: Galli – Tassotti, Maldini, Fuser (65′ Evani), Costacurta, Baresi, Donadoni, Van Basten, Ancelotti, Rijkaard, Massaro (70′ Simone)
Atl. Nacional: Higuita – Escobar, Gómez, Cassiani, Herrera, Pérez, Arango (46′ Restrepo), Alvarez, Alboleda (46′ Usuriaga), García, Trellez
Franco Baresi lifted the Toyota Cup.
Alberigo Evani received the goal-scoring trophy – a brand new Toyota to fly home.
Milan started their triumphal round.
The players honoured the man behind their success – Arrigo Sacchi.
Milan won and ended 1989 triumphant.
Atletico Nacional (Medellin) lost. In a way, too bad – it was unfortunate loss and would have been nicer if the underdog won. But on the other hand… Milan was the classier team and scored a goal, unlike the Colombians. Also, a victory of a club related to the Colombian drug mafia would not have been pretty… better Berlusconi than the notorious Medellin clan. No matter – it was good effort, the boys stood their ground, did whatever they could, there was no shame. Only bitterness of the chancy way they lost.
Milan confirmed they were the best in the world even without Gullit. Nobody could doubt the greatness of this vintage – they won all international trophies this year. Certainly they were going to stay on top, a new dynasty shaping the football world and its development. Milan was back to the greatness it enjoyed in the 1960s and won its second Intercontinental Cup. 20 years passed from their first victory in 1969, the tournament was changed and called concurrently the Toyota Cup, so Milan won for the first time this format played in Tokyo – in a sense, climbing one more peak.

European Player Of The Year

European Player of the Year. If only Ruud Gullit played the whole year… but he did not and and thus only 2 Dutchmen were in the top 3 – instead of 3 in 1988. If 1988 voting recognized the great success of Holland, this year it was recognition of Milan. But the players were the same… Frank Rijkard was 3rd with 43 points. Franco Baresi – 2nd with 80 points. Marco van Basten – number one with 129 points. No wonder – Milan won every international tournament they played in 1989 and these were its key stars.
To a large degree the prime decisive moment was the European Champions Cup final in which van Basten shined and scored 2 goals – here is his second. Milan was winning thanks to his fine play and great scoring ability. And he was a delight for the fans too – elegant, skillful, always motivated, not a dirty player, a real jewel.

So, for a second consecutive year Marco van Basten was voted the top player of Europe. It was just and fair, he was a great star and the only bitter taste was not about him, but about the fact that the three wonderful Dutchmen played together at the same time was no matter what two of them had to be ranked lower. Ruud Gullit already was a player of the year, but poor Frank Rijkard seemingly had no chance… Apart from that – Marco van Basten ruled. He not only played for the top teams – Holland and Milan – but always shined. No doubt about it.