Group 1

 

Italy and Poland opened the group rounds – 8 years ago Poland won against Italy and went all the way to bronze medals. Italy meantime was eliminated at the group phase and went home in disgrace. Now the picture was different – on paper.

Also on the pitch. The match was nothing much and both teams left much to be desired, but Italy was the more active and dangerous team. They had perhaps the only chance to score, but Rossi missed. Poland played competent football, but nothing more than that. 0-0 at the end, a result which observers considered tactically beneficial to both teams.

Peru came out on the pitch as favourite and seemingly determined to win, perhaps even taking the match over-seriously, because Uribe and Leguia were among the starters. Cameroon… it was the first chance for the world to see them, that was all.

As the match progressed, kind of frustration grew – seemingly, Peru did not take this much seriously enough. Cameroon surprised with enthusiastic and competent performance. Classier – on paper – Peru did not look better, stronger, or deserving to win at all – and they did not. Nobody scored, a second 0-0 in the group, so everything had to start anew. Actually, a goal was scored and against Peru, but Roger Milla was offside. Still, Peru was expected to start playing the next match. Cameroon was considered a pleasant team, yet, nothing special. Thomas N’Kono was singled out as a potential new discovery.

The next match between Italy and Peru looked like the most important in the group – no result would have really satisfied either team, but a loss would be close to exiting. In the first half Italy was more active and scored early, thanks to Bruno Conti.

After the goal the tempo deteriorated and the match transformed into typical Italian dread – just killing time. Even the foul – unintended – on the referee did not liven up the match. In the second half Peru pushed ahead and outplayed Italy. At last they equalized in the 84th minute. After the match Tim was happy, saying that the result is fine by him. Bearzot was viciously attacked by Italian journalists, to the point of losing his cool for a moment and snapping at them, that in 1978 the team started great and quickly went home. Nobody was convinced – Italy was no good so far. 1-1.

Poland vs Cameroon was estimated with care after the opening matches and the game proved the careful wise.

Cameroon was active and dangerous, Poland was pale shadow not of the team of 1974, but the one of 1978 and only inexperience, so was felt, prevented Cameroon from winning. Cameroon deserved to win, but the match ended 0-0. Most critics singled out the Polish stars Lato, Szarmach, and Boniek.

Before the last round the group table was unique – all teams with equal points from ties, which even looked like to continue to the end. Tim certainly suggested that, by saying that Peru will be happy with a tie, for their single scored so far goal will place them above Poland. Not convincing Italy and inspired Cameroon were also seen the makers of one more tie. The scary potential future stuck out its head: this time if all matches were tied, there was still a way to make the final table. But the group so far revealed another possibility: all matches ending 0-0. Then what? Well, not this year.

Peru clearly came for a tie. Poland seemingly had no chance. But suddenly the picture was entirely different when the match began – Tim considered Poland too slow and painfully tired, and declared that his approach will be just to play at high tempo.

But it was Poland playing at high speed and as the match progressed, actually the Poles destroyed Peru. In this match they arguably played the closest football to their performance at the 1974 World Cup. It 5-0 in the 76th minute. In the 82nd La Rosa scored at last, but it was too little too late. 5-1. The spell of ties was broken, Poland qualified, Peru was down and out. It looked like Peru played a high prize for over-confidence and not getting serious enough against Cameroon, but they had to only blame themselves. And their coach Tim, of course. Poland, which considered out before the beginning of the match not only qualified for the second round, but suddenly looked a very dangerous team.

Italy was in the same situation as Peru before the starts of the match against Cameroon: they needed a tie. More than possible, for they already knew that Peru was eliminated. Bearzot made a single change – Oriali replaced Marini, which on the surface appeared to be a decision in favour of attack. It looked like Italy was aiming at winning, which may have placed them at first place in the group: Bearzot said that Italy must avoid facing Brazil in the next phase. However, winning with more than 4 goals difference looked outlandish.

Cameroon played again very well and made enough trouble for Italy, which struggled once again. Yet, Graziani managed to score in the 60th minute. Happiness lasted very short time – in the next minute Cameroon equalized and Italy had to fret to the final whistle. Everybody watching – except the Italians, of course – felt that Cameroon deserved to win, but the game ended 1-1. Italy got the second place thanks to more scored goals and was to meet Brazil, but it was preferable to going home.

Poland 3 1 2 0 5 1 +4 4

Italy 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 3

Cameroon 3 0 3 0 1 1 0 3

Peru 3 0 2 1 2 6 −4 2

match, but few expected the team to last. Italy was a big disappointment so far, even not deserving to go ahead, but there they were – to the second round, which certainly will be the end of Italy. The quicker, the better at that. Cameroon left wonderful impression – they ended their campaign unbeaten, the first African team to do so. They were unlucky, that was all – apart from that: the most competent third-world team to date. Thomas N’Kono instantly became famous and effectively was one of the best goalkeepers at this championship. Finally Africa had arrived.

Poland showed some promise at its last match, but few expected the team to last. Italy was a big disappointment so far, even not deserving to go ahead, but there they were – to the second round, which certainly will be the end of Italy. The quicker, the better at that.

 

Group 1

Group 1. Italy was the favourite at a glance. Yes, Italy was always favourite, but this time she was a second-rate one. Not a prime candidate for the title. Lucky to draw an easy group. The promise shown at the 1978 World Cup was stilted. Enzo Bearzot preferred older players – this was already settled to the point of becoming a myth, for the selection was actually well balanced age-wise. True, the starters tended to be near 30.

Head coach: Enzo Bearzot

 

1

GK

Dino Zoff (c)

28 February 1942 (aged 40)

NA

Juventus

2

DF

Franco Baresi

8 May 1960 (aged 22)

NA

Milan

3

DF

Giuseppe Bergomi

22 December 1963 (aged 18)

NA

Internazionale

4

DF

Antonio Cabrini

8 October 1957 (aged 24)

NA

Juventus

5

DF

Fulvio Collovati

9 May 1957 (aged 25)

NA

Milan

6

DF

Claudio Gentile

27 September 1953 (aged 28)

NA

Juventus

7

DF

Gaetano Scirea

25 May 1953 (aged 29)

NA

Juventus

8

DF

Pietro Vierchowod

6 April 1959 (aged 23)

NA

Fiorentina

9

MF

Giancarlo Antognoni

1 April 1954 (aged 28)

NA

Fiorentina

10

MF

Giuseppe Dossena

2 May 1958 (aged 24)

NA

Torino

11

MF

Giampiero Marini

25 February 1951 (aged 31)

NA

Internazionale

12

GK

Ivano Bordon

13 April 1951 (aged 31)

NA

Internazionale

13

MF

Gabriele Oriali

25 November 1952 (aged 29)

NA

Internazionale

14

MF

Marco Tardelli

24 September 1954 (aged 27)

NA

Juventus

15

MF

Franco Causio

1 February 1949 (aged 33)

NA

Udinese

16

MF

Bruno Conti

13 March 1955 (aged 27)

NA

Roma

17

FW

Daniele Massaro

23 May 1961 (aged 21)

NA

Fiorentina

18

FW

Alessandro Altobelli

28 November 1955 (aged 26)

NA

Internazionale

19

FW

Francesco Graziani

16 December 1952 (aged 29)

NA

Fiorentina

20

FW

Paolo Rossi

23 September 1956 (aged 25)

NA

Juventus

21

FW

Franco Selvaggi

15 May 1953 (aged 29)

NA

Cagliari

22

GK

Giovanni Galli

29 April 1958 (aged 24)

NA

Fiorentina

Pros, cons, and trivia: the oldest player at the finals – Dino Zoff at 40. Numbers were given alphabetically by lines – except the goalkeepers. That is, defenders, midfielders, strikers. Iron defense, as ever, very competent players, team based on Juventus, excellent playmaker – Antognoni. On the negative side: Rossi, who was banned from playing for quite a long time, was probably a liability, Zoff had problems with long shots, suspect attack, lack of development after 1978, perhaps even going downhill. Expected to win the group, but reaching the semi-finals would depend largely on lucky draw. Bearzot lamented the absence of Bettega. A favourite, but unlikely champion.

Poland and Peru were expected to compete for the second place. Peru perhaps had the edge – based on their strong play at both 1970 and 1978 World Cups. Once again Brazilian coach plus few old hands with enormous experience, going back to 1970. A bright young star in attack – Uribe.

Head coach: Tim (Brazil)

 

1

GK

Eusebio Acasuzo

8 April 1952 (aged 30)

NA

Universitario

2

DF

Jaime Duarte

27 February 1955 (aged 27)

NA

Alianza Lima

3

DF

Salvador Salguero

10 August 1951 (aged 30)

NA

Alianza Lima

4

DF

Hugo Gastulo

9 January 1958 (aged 24)

NA

Universitario

5

MF

Germán Leguía

2 January 1954 (aged 28)

NA

Universitario

6

MF

José Velásquez

4 June 1952 (aged 30)

NA

Independiente Medellín

7

FW

Gerónimo Barbadillo

24 September 1952 (aged 29)

NA

UANL Tigres

8

MF

César Cueto

16 June 1952 (aged 29)

NA

Atlético Nacional

9

MF

Julio César Uribe

9 May 1958 (aged 24)

NA

Sporting Cristal

10

FW

Teófilo Cubillas

8 March 1949 (aged 33)

NA

Fort Lauderdale Strikers

11

FW

Juan Carlos Oblitas

16 December 1951 (aged 30)

NA

Seraing

12

GK

José González

10 July 1954 (aged 27)

NA

Alianza Lima

13

MF

Oscar Arizaga

20 August 1957 (aged 24)

NA

Atlético Chalaco

14

MF

Miguel Gutiérrez

19 November 1956 (aged 25)

NA

Sporting Cristal

15

DF

Rubén Toribio Díaz (c)

17 April 1952 (aged 30)

NA

Sporting Cristal

16

DF

Jorge Olaechea

27 August 1956 (aged 25)

NA

Alianza Lima

17

DF

Franco Navarro

10 November 1961 (aged 20)

NA

Deportivo Municipal

18

MF

Eduardo Malásquez

13 October 1957 (aged 24)

NA

Deportivo Municipal

19

FW

Guillermo La Rosa

6 June 1952 (aged 30)

NA

Atlético Nacional

20

FW

Percy Rojas

16 September 1949 (aged 32)

NA

Seraing

21

GK

Ramón Quiroga

23 July 1950 (aged 31)

NA

Sporting Cristal

22

MF

Luis Reyna

06 May 1959 (aged 23)

NA

Sporting Cristal

 

Chumpitaz was not selected – with this the sensational question how really old was he was buried. Very experienced squad, capable of rising to the occasion. Uribe was a major force to reckon with. But – rather weak defense, the key stars were beyond their prime and the presence of Cubillas, now 33, was questioned in Peru. The big names played abroad, but not in the leading countries: Velasquez, Cueto, and La Rosa in Colombia, Oblitas and Rojas in lowly Seraing, Belgium, and Cubillas – in the ‘graveyard’ of stars, NASL. Quiroga was a liability since the suspect match against Argentina in 1978. A lot depended on the fitness of Leguia and Uribe, both arriving at the finals with injuries.

Poland had a chance, depending largely on how Peru played – Poland was in decline, made obvious in 1978 and clearly had not a team similar to the one of 1974. Remains of the great team were the leading players, the backbone, of the current squad and they only got older. Maybe too old.

Head coach: Antoni Piechniczek

 

1

GK

Józef Młynarczyk

20 September 1953 (aged 28)

10

Widzew Łódź

2

DF

Marek Dziuba

19 December 1955 (aged 26)

44

ŁKS Łódź

3

MF

Janusz Kupcewicz

9 December 1955 (aged 26)

10

Arka Gdynia

4

DF

Tadeusz Dolny

7 May 1958 (aged 24)

4

Górnik Zabrze

5

MF

Paweł Janas

4 March 1953 (aged 29)

47

Legia Warszawa

6

DF

Piotr Skrobowski

16 October 1961 (aged 20)

14

Wisła Kraków

7

DF

Jan Jałocha

18 July 1957 (aged 24)

8

Wisła Kraków

8

MF

Waldemar Matysik

27 September 1961 (aged 20)

10

Górnik Zabrze

9

MF

Władysław Żmuda (c)

6 June 1954 (aged 28)

72

Widzew Łódź

10

DF

Stefan Majewski

31 January 1956 (aged 26)

17

Legia Warszawa

11

MF

Włodzimierz Smolarek

16 July 1957 (aged 24)

12

Widzew Łódź

12

DF

Roman Wójcicki

8 January 1958 (aged 24)

12

Śląsk Wrocław

13

MF

Andrzej Buncol

21 September 1959 (aged 22)

9

Legia Warszawa

14

MF

Andrzej Pałasz

22 July 1960 (aged 21)

14

Górnik Zabrze

15

MF

Włodzimierz Ciołek

24 March 1956 (aged 26)

12

Stal Mielec

16

FW

Grzegorz Lato

8 April 1950 (aged 32)

92

Lokeren

17

FW

Andrzej Szarmach

3 October 1950 (aged 31)

59

Auxerre

18

MF

Marek Kusto

29 April 1954 (aged 28)

15

Legia Warszawa

19

MF

Andrzej Iwan

10 November 1959 (aged 22)

19

Wisła Kraków

20

MF

Zbigniew Boniek

3 March 1956 (aged 26)

50

Widzew Łódź

21

GK

Jacek Kazimierski

17 August 1959 (aged 22)

4

Legia Warszawa

22

GK

Piotr Mowlik

21 April 1951 (aged 31)

21

Lech Poznań

Competent team with strong attacking line – Boniek, Iwan, Smolarek plus famous veterans Lato and Szarmach. If in form – lethal. Four players from the great 1974 squad – Lato, Szarmach, Zmuda, and Kusto (another one – Kapka – was dropped at the final selection). A whole bunch with 1978 experience. On the negative side was the sense that the team was disjointed – rather ordinary goalkeepers, defense largely dependent on the veteran Zmuda, so-so midfield, and crowded attack, which may place young Iwan and Smolarek on the bench. Clear absence of capable playmaker. As a novelty – the famous veterans kept the numbers they became famous with in 1974: Zmuda – 9, an anomaly for a central defender, Lato – 16, Szarmach – 17. Only Kusto had a different number – 22 in 1974, 18 in 1982 – but he was a reserve 8 years earlier. And so he was now. Piechniczek declared that his team is young, but stronger than the 1974 one – his statement sounded strange.

Cameroon was the outsider. Nobody expected anything from the unknown team – yes, Tunisia played well in 1978, but Cameroon was coming from ‘black’ Africa, so Zaire – and its pathetic performance – was invoked. In any case, the team was entirely unknown – yes, 5 players were professionals abroad, but only Tokoto was familiar name and now he was 34, playing in North America.

 

Head coach: Jean Vincent

 

1

GK

Thomas N’Kono (c)

20 July 1956 (aged 25)

NA

Canon Yaoundé

2

DF

Michel Kaham

1 June 1952 (aged 30)

NA

Stade Quimperois

3

DF

Edmond Enoka

17 December 1955 (aged 26)

NA

Dragon Douala

4

DF

René N’Djeya

9 October 1953 (aged 28)

NA

Union Douala

5

DF

Elie Onana

13 October 1958 (aged 23)

NA

Federal Foumban

6

MF

Emmanuel Kundé

15 July 1956 (aged 25)

NA

Canon Yaoundé

7

MF

Ephrem M’Bom

19 October 1955 (aged 26)

NA

Canon Yaoundé

8

MF

Grégoire M’Bida

27 January 1955 (aged 27)

NA

Canon Yaoundé

9

FW

Roger Milla

20 May 1952 (aged 30)

NA

Bastia

10

FW

Jean-Pierre Tokoto

26 January 1948 (aged 34)

NA

Philadelphia Fever

11

MF

Charles Toubé

22 January 1958 (aged 24)

NA

Tonnerre Yaoundé

12

GK

Joseph-Antoine Bell

8 October 1954 (aged 27)

NA

Africa Sports

13

FW

Paul Bahoken

7 July 1955 (aged 26)

NA

Cannes

14

MF

Théophile Abega

9 July 1954 (aged 27)

NA

Canon Yaoundé

15

DF

François N’Doumbé

30 January 1954 (aged 28)

NA

Union Douala

16

DF

Ibrahim Aoudou

23 August 1955 (aged 26)

NA

Cannes

17

MF

Joseph Kamga

17 August 1953 (aged 28)

NA

Union Douala

18

FW

Jacques N’Guea

8 November 1955 (aged 26)

NA

Canon Yaoundé

19

MF

Joseph Enanga

18 November 1956 (aged 25)

NA

Union Douala

20

FW

Oscar Eyobo

23 October 1961 (aged 20)

NA

Dynamo Douala

21

FW

Ernest Ebongué

15 May 1962 (aged 20)

NA

Tonnerre Yaoundé

22

GK

Simon Tchobang

31 August 1951 (aged 30)

NA

Dynamo Douala

The debutantes had nothing in their favour. They even changed their head coach – again with European, but more famous – at least as a player – than the Yugoslav Zupic, who qualified them to the finals. But it was more than suspect that Jean Vincent will elevate the team – it was rather typical African approach, leading to nothing: changing the coach in the last moment. One may be happy that a long time and respected professional – Tokoto – finally has a chance to play a bit of World Cup football, but the rest were nobodies and the only interest Cameroon would create can be among coaches – possibly some cheap promising African player can be hired. Otherwise, Cameroon was only to provide points to the other teams and perhaps who scored most goals in their net would advance.

Mundial 1982

Of course, death was not in the air back in 1981 and the first half of 1982 – the season was going on, preparations for the World Cup, the big excitement of the finals, the great expectations of a new format and more teams. The very trophy was new, to be contested for the first time.

The hype and the buzz were building up – the stars, the teams, the favourites, the internal scandals, the injuries, the stars, the prophets, the critics. The fretting over the question will be Spain ready for the finals and as if this was not enough, will be Colombia able to host the 1986 World Cup. Criticism, speculations… ever new, yet, so old. No matter what, the World Cup rules a particular year and is a culmination of the 4 years since the previous one. No doubt, 1982 was special: 24 teams at the finals, a feast.

The feast was emphasized by the official poster, done by Juan Miro, the most famous painter ever engaged to create World Cup poster.

The logo captured the new format of 24 teams, although it was abbreviated immediately.

The new formula provided almost a month of high-end football: 6 round-robin at first, then 4 groups of 3 teams each, semi-finals, the match for bronze medals, and the peak of all that – the final. By tradition, the reigning champions were opening the championship, which was to be played in 14 cities. The second phase, after the preliminary groups was to be played in 4 cities, but mostly in Madrid and Barcelona, which was almost as going to Mecca or Jerusalem for the faithful.

Grinning Naranjito, the official emblem-mascot, promised friendly fun – perhaps even the feared British fans would take on the spirit and change their violent ways.

The fans, however eccentric, were expected to have great fun – and making noise was not seen as a problem.

There was much to dream about – for instance, to see your team winning the World Cup at freshly modernized Santiago Bernabeu Stadium.

Of course, the first thing to do was tacky: teams recorded songs and as much as it was ridiculous to expect Kevin Keegan and company to hit notes, fans sheepishly bought the half-baked ‘anthems’. So far , all festive, like in heaven. Let’s go to business.

1982

1982

Remarkable year, many will agree. But remarkable in a way few wish to think of – in 1982 football died and its death was announced from very unusual voice, to make it really sinister. Yes, there were excellent moments, games, players. There was the new World Cup. But death was everywhere. Not just the rampant and spreading plague of hooliganism. Not just the ugly scenes on the field and brutal games. It was fundamental shift – seen on the field and verbally expressed. It came in the last stages of the World Cup finals, when Brazil and then France were eliminated: it was clear sign that it was not enough to play. Rather the opposite – if you play creatively, if you are trying to be attacking, imaginative, crowd pleasing, you are going to lose. Even when you have the best players. Football skills were no longer valid argument. Just the opposite – the team using brutal and cynical approach to the point of murder will win. It was not like that before, even during the ultra-defensive 1960s. There was new philosophy, justifying every mean – from the fake match between West Germany and Austria through the torn to pieces shirt of Ardiles to Batiston sent to hospital for months by Schumacher. The winners were cold, brutal, scheming, they stopped at nothing – and they were not particularly great players. What counted was only the result at the final whistle. The new ‘philosophy’ was made painfully clear: ‘Football is war and only winning is important, no matter how achieved’.

Paul Breitner said that and it was not merely ironic, but outright scary, that an elegant, creative, imaginative, and generally clean player became the voice of the new ‘philosophy’. It was painful by now to see him surrounded by plain robots entirely unable to grasp his ideas, it was frustrating to see him trying to pass the ball to someone and not finding anybody able to make use of the pass. And it was scary to hear his words. Which were, unfortunately, a plain fact. The war was on and only winning counted. The game was the casualty – Brazil and France suddenly became a negative example: to play meant to lose. Don’t do it. Sportsmanship was for loser – winners killed. They were strong, had no emotions… they were on their feet and you were down. Who was down was also out. War is about murder – the winner is the one killing all others. The winner is only one. Second best? Losers. Dead. Third place? Meaningless… losers all. Effectively, the new ‘philosophy’ meant to trample to the the final through the bodies and make the last kill. The sheer horror and ugliness of the process made everybody instantly forgetting everything else and just been happy there was a winner and the war was over. Football was dead. Of course, it was not the end of the game yet – football agonized for years, reaching the bottom in 1990. Only then the importance of Breitner’s words and 1982 became entirely clear – then the game had to be artificially revitalized, rules had to be changed in attempt of bringing it back to life.

 

Debut

Retirements make headline news, not debutantes. Yes, they are mentioned and profiled, but only as a possibility. It is easier to speak much later – yes, Frank Rijkaard debuted in 1980-81 season. A beginning of great career, one fantastic player arrived.

Back then one Franklin Edmundo Rijkaard, 18-years old, debuted for Ajax. Talented – yes. Hopeful – yes. More? Not yet. A product of the already famous Ajax youth system, but still only potential promising player. Others failed, leaving no memory. Ajax was not in its best times, rather desperately trying to build a team close to the great one of early 1970s and the shadow left by Cruijff and company was too thick to break. Was Rijkaard able to stay in the tam, let alone lead it to new glory? Only time could tell… there was no way imagining Rijkaard will win more trophies than Roberto Rivelino in 1980-81.

Retirement

Retirement. This year Rivelino stepped down. Roberto Rivellino – or Rivelino, as his name was spelled most often – was born on January 1, 1946 in Sao Paulo. Perhaps his Italian name, so close to the beloved by Brazilians diminutive form of naming their stars left him as one of the few Brazilian stars known by his full real name and not by nickname. He debuted in 1965 for Corinthians and played for them until 1973. His debut was so impressive, he was played his first match for Brazil in his first season as a professional footballer.

With Corinthians jersey the attacking midfielder played a total of 471 matches in which he scored 141 goals. Highly skilled, he had close control of the ball, great vision, accurate long passes, and deadly free-kicks.

The fans quickly named him “O Rei do Parque” (‘King of the Park’, after Corinthians’ home ground, Parque São Jorge). He was outstanding in a time, when there were so many fantastic players.

Against Ademir Da Guia (Palmeiras). Rivelino won – he was regular national team player, Da Guia only in 1974…

Against Gerson, another master of organizing the game and long passes – Rivelino hold his ground.

Friends with Pele and teammates in the national team.

Enemies with Pele on the pitch. There was only one number 10 in the national team and the only way Rivelino was going to get it was Pele stepping down.

A great star, cultivating his moustache, which became his trade-mark. But he played in a bad time for Corinthians, which did not win anything since 1954. Fans love, but they also hate – in 1973 Corinthians lost once again and Rivelino was singled out as the most responsible for losing. He moved to Fluminense.

Between 1973 and 1978 he played 158 matches for Flu, scoring 53 goals. Success came at last – he was part of the “the tricolor machine”- Doval, Pintinho, Gil, and Carlos Alberto Torres – which won the Rio de Janeiro championship in 1975 and 1976. He was credited with scoring the fastest goal in football history, which he scored from the centre right after the referee whistled the start of a match: Rivelino spotted the opposition goalkeeper still praying on his knees and promptly lashed a long ball in the net. One thing Rivelino did not won was the championship of Brazil – but Pele did not won it either, as many other great players at the time.

Internationally, there was more and greater success.

Rivelino played at 3 World Cups and won the world title in 1970. Back then Brazilian pundits worried about Zagalo’s selection – he had too many number 10 players, Pele, Tostao, Gerson, and Rivelino. At least one had to be left out was the thinking, which Zagalo dismissed and played them all together to the thrill to the fans around the globe. The next two World Cups were rather disappointing, but Rivelino left his mark.

Here is his spectacular goal from a free-kick against DDR in the 1974 World Cup. Still remains as one of the greatest moments in football.

1974. Scotland’s wall had all reasons to worry his artistic free-kicks. The long-time Manchester United captain and Scottish international Martin Buchan recently summed it all: ‘It’s one thing watching Rivelino do his tricks on TV, but when you are up close and trying to get the ball off him it’s not so much fun’. Buchan singled out his three appearances against Brazil as his most memorable moments playing for Scotland. But time was advancing and Rivelino was aging. 1978 was the end of his career as a national team player.

In 1979, 33 years old, he signed a contract with Al Hilal (Saudi Arabia). This was a historic moment – Rivelino was the first world class star going to play in Asia. There were Europeans playing there before – largely in Hong Kong – but nobody made the news of the day. This transfer was entirely different – on one hand, players of Rivelino’s status moved to Europe, on occasion to Mexico, and after 1973 – to NASL. Going to Asia was something new and very unusual. On the other hand, Arabis countries got so much oil money they had the means of hiring true stars and this signing looked like beginning of ambitious program of cultivating and developing the game over there. No better way then getting a high profile player.

Rivelino with Najeeb Al-Imam, playing for Al Hilal in 1979. Rivelino played 57 matches for Al Hilal, scoring 23 goals. This was his last club – in 1981, 35 years old, he announced his retirement.

He left the beautiful game after a total of 686 appearances and 217 goals on club level, 92 matches and 26 goals for Brazil, and one World title.

The legend now – a true one, so he is sporting the colours of the clubs he left a huge mark on – Corinthians and Fluminense. As a whole, Roberto Rivelino rather belonged to 1960s football, not the total football of the next decade. He was unable to adapt to the new requirements – hardly ever helped the defense – but he was a master of organizing the game. He is critical of contemporary football, lamenting that there are no great players anymore. May be he is right – after all, he was a great star in the time of the great stars. Let’s face it – Christiano Ronaldo, Messi, and Neymar are not world champions (so far), Roberto Rivelino is.

The losers

So after the end of the qualifications one question remained, due to the enlarged World Cup finals – who was left out? There were always strong teams unable to qualify before. And now?

Japan was just starting her football program and South Korea was not even beginning its her own, so Asia hardly had any team of class – except Iran.

Arguably, they had the strongest domestic championship, developed during the 1970s and in 1978 the national team played well, showing lots of potential. But then the revolution took place, the old government went to dust and the new religious rulers took power. Football was left behind and Iran did not participate at all in the qualifications.

Africa. Perhaps South Africa. It was said, that football was lively, professional, popular, and may be the best on this continent. This was the only African country European players went frequently to play a season or two – mostly British, German, and Dutch. But it was also all hearsay – South Africa was expelled from world football for a long time, nobody saw their football, divided into racial lines. It is more than questionable an apartheid system could make a decent team.

Perhaps Ghana. Often continental champions and considered maybe the best football playing nation on this continent. But this was also a rumor, depending on who one listened to. The plain truth was that Ghana never reached World Cup finals so far and, unlike other countries, hardly had any well known professionals based in Europe.

CONCACAF. NASL was one thing, but USA and Canada were something else – the hype and constant import of stars did not help domestic football a bit. Since neither country took the obvious other road – to naturalize foreign players, who did not play for national teams before, both countries were extremely weak. The only missing the finals team was Mexico.

No matter what, Mexico was the strongest football nation in North and Central America. They had a good number of strong players at that time – Hugo Sanchez is enough to mention. But they had only themselves to blame for not going to the finals. Yet, they would have been stronger finalist than either of the CONCACAF representatives.

South America. Uruguay. Yes, they were in the toughest group. But they just won Mundialito and there was a new promising young generation, revival seemingly was taking place.

Revival, if any, was apparently at very early stage and Uruguay in reality was perhaps not worse, but surely not better than Chile or Peru. One may lament the old glory, but currently Uruguay had not a team to be missed. Paraguay was similar, although was less clout.

Europe. Now, here was a team ‘left behind’ – Holland. Memories were fresh, players were still famous, even definitive for the last decade, Dutch players were hot commodity. What could be a World Cup without Oranje? What a bitter fate – they were unlucky to be in the toughest possible qualification group.

In any other qualification group Holland would have qualified, that was quite clear. But in the same time Holland was in decline, made very obvious at the 1980 European championship. The new generation was not even close to the mighty Dutch of the 1970s. And the crisis was not going to go away if they qualified – very likely, playing at the finals would have been a bitter disappointment for everyone. Tough, physical team, but nothing special.

May be Sweden… never favourites, never having very powerful team, the Swedes always played with big hearts, even above their level, and endeared everybody.

But at the 1978 World Cup they showed decline and lack of new talented players. The team above tried, as Swedes ever did, but had too many shortcoming and was not able to impress. Decline settled – yes, like Holland, if in another qualification group and a bit of luck, they could have reached the finals. But definitely Sweden was not a team left behind – with or without them, the finals were not to be different.

Recapitulation. The new formula of the World Cup practically allowed all strong teams of the world to play at the finals. Before it was mostly Europeans teams missing the finals, but not so now. Only Holland – and it was a big ‘maybe’ – may had some larger impact on the finals. Only CONCACAF would have been represented better – in that only in half – by Mexico. May be for the first time all strong teams of the world were going to be seen at the finals.

Asia. Group 13

 

Group 13. Asia. Asia… if anybody deserved more spots at the finals, it would be Africa – for nothing else, but just to, perhaps, elevate the continent from chaos to some more serious stage of development. Asia was not even on African level yet… and there was also the lowest of the low – Oceania. On the football map Oceania was only three countries at that time, so they probably did not complain at all and very likely were happy to have a chance at least to play against more and various teams. Asia was further weakened by the expulsion of Israel and the withdrawal of Iran, due to the political change in the country. 19 countries entered elaborate tournament, going through stages – the vast continent and the inclusion of Oceania made travel difficult, so the preliminary stages were organized geographically, perhaps taking into account the wealth of the countries too, for it was not possible to follow geographic lines entirely. At the end, only Zone A was played in the usual manner – that is, teams travle from to place to visit opponents. Zones B and C were staged as round-robin tournaments, hosted, correspondingly, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and Al-Kuwait, Kuwait. Group D was entirely differently organized – there was preliminary stage at first, at which countries visited each other. After that there were 2 sub-groups, played in one place – Hong Kong. This round-robin sub-groups were followed by semi-finals and a final. The winner joined the winners of the other three groups to a final tournament, played, however, traditionally – teams hosting at home and traveling to visit opponents. This last stage brought troubles, perhaps kept under lid so far, in the open. The program was typical for the times – a clever team was able to get convenient schedule, giving a strong chance. Kuwait not only played 3 of the last 4 games, but hosted all of them. Having a good start with 2 away wins, they made the best of home turf and high moral – won twice and tied one match, thus, one match before the end of the qualifications, Kuwait was unreachable and qualified for the first time to World Cup finals. Saudi Arabia, the outsiders at this stage, hosted the last match against New Zealand. However, New Zealand was outraged the previous game, when they felt the hosts, Kuwait, were blatantly helped by the referees and New Zealand was cheated big time. The accusations were ignored by the Asian football body, which further enraged New Zealand. May be rage motivated them to utter destruction of Saudi Arabia – 5-0. With which New Zealand equalized not only points, but also the goal-different of China. And now salt was put on the wound: New Zealand outscored China by 2 goals – usually, when goal-difference is a factor, in case of equal record, the team scoring more goals gets the higher place. The other possible way is considering the record of the direct games played: if that, New Zealand also must have been placed ahead of China, because they won one match and tied the other. But… New Zealand was 3rd in the final table. Which led, who knows why, to a play-off in Singapur – only now New Zealand managed to get ahead, beating China 2-1. As a final note to the mess, perhaps to show just how big was the mess, a famous referee was invited for this match: the Brazilian Filho. Local referees were not trusted at this point.

1.Kuwait^ 6 9 4 1 1 8- 6

2.China> 6 7 3 1 2 9- 4

3.New Zealand> 6 7 2 3 1 11- 6

4.Saudi Arabia 6 1 0 1 5 4-16

This is the controversial final table of Asia. After that the play-off between New Zealand and |China was played and New Zealand became the second representative of the continent. It was also the last team to qualify for the World Cup finals.

Kuwait – unheard of team, but, if anything, oil-dollars were aplenty. Asia had nothing to show yet, so why not they?

Back row (left to right): Adrian Elrick, Duncan Cole, Mark Armstrong, Grant Turner, Allan Boath, Dave Bright, Clive Campbell

Middle row: Kevin Fallon (assistant coach), Ricki Herbert, Brian Turner, Barry Pickering, Richard Wilson, Frank van Hattum, Glen Adam, Sam Malcolmson, John Adshead (coach)

Front row: Steve Wooddin, Keith Mackay, Steve Sumner (captain), Charlie Dempsey (New Zealand World Cup director), Bobby Almond, John Hill, Glenn Dods .

New Zealand at the beginning of its qualifying campaign. Entirely unknown team, not expected to do anything impressive at the finals. But brave boys, going to the World Cup.

Africa. Group 12

Group 12. Africa. Perhaps the most grumbling continent about misrepresentation – Africans complained bitterly, that they deserve more spots at the World Cup finals. Now the spots were doubled – from one to two. Many felt it was right – the rise of African football was advocated for the most of the 1970s. African players were well respected professionals, even stars, for a long time in Europe and their numbers gradually increased. In Africa, players developed ‘naturally’, something lost not only in Europe, but during the 1970s in South America as well – the Africans were fresh, close to the origins of football, the only hope to make attractive already too mechanical game. Critics pointed out, that African football was notoriously poorly organized and ridden with corruption, the prediction of great African football were not only stale, but becoming an empty myth, for nothing materialized for so long. Instead, African teams were just a punching bags at World Cup finals and who needs more of that? The shadow of laughable Zaire in 1974 was very strong and dark. And skeptics were seemingly right… 29 countries entered qualifications Less than in Europe… Entry was one thing, actual participation – quite another. As ever before, teams started to withdraw – Ghana, Uganda, and later Lybia. The formula was messy as ever, scandals erupted as ever, money were short as ever, walkovers happened as ever – Egypt, Madagascar, teams went ahead without having to play – Sudan, Liberia, Togo, and Zimbabwe, rules were seemingly improvised on the spot – there was no overtime to break a tie, but immediate penalty shoot-out. Eventually, the qualifications reached culmination: two pairs, the winners going to Spain. Both finalist practically emerged after the first leg: Algeria won over hosting Nigeria 2-0 and Cameroon also beat the home team, Morocco 2-0. Curiously, the second legs ended in entirely same results too: at home, Cameroon beat Morocco 2-1 and with the same result Algeria prevailed over Nigeria. If anyone paid attention, they would note some goalscorers – Madjer and Belloumi (Algeria) and Milla (Cameroon). Tokoto (Cameroon) was already well known in Europe. But except the French, the old and biggest buyers of African players, nobody cared to look closer.

Newcomers to the finals. Noted for successful club football and few players, playing well in Europe, but generally unknown, following the dubious tradition of Black Africa – a new team going to World Cup finals and disappearing without a trace after that. As ever, European coach to get them to some success, but also questioning the class of the football on the continent: if little known coach, if known at all, like Branco Zutic, could lift the team to the finals of the planet, imagine the other teams, the opposition. That was the immediate impression.

Arabic country going the finals was, by far, the preferable option – they performed better than Black African teams at world finals. But… here it was again: no consistency, no continuation. No Egypt, no Morocco, no Tunisia, which left good impression in 1978. Newcomers, perhaps as mercurial as those before them. And since better organized and structurally developed Arabic countries were unable to get more than a single spot… forget about the ‘rising’ football in Africa. Skeptics having a field day at the moment.

CONCACAF. Group 11

Group 11. CONCACAF – Central and North America. 15 countries entered, but money, logistics, and class meant specific qualification structure, going through stages. Mexico was the undoubted favourite and for the second spot… it was anybody’s guess, for all other participants were weak, even harmless. The northern countries started together in preliminary Northern Zone, the smallest one. Two teams were qualifying to the next round – here the first alarm was triggered: Mexico finished 2nd, after Canada. Well, not very important… Mexico was perhaps not seriously prepared yet, or they played just the bare minimum. They were the sure finalist, nothing to worry.

The last stage was the really important one – a qualification tournament in Tegucigalpa, Honduras, played in November 1981. Six teams qualified to it and played against each other. Clearly, the only question was which country will get the second COCACAF spot at the World Cup finals. The intrigue was lame: the ‘soccer war’ between Honduras and El Salvador from 1969 was unearthed for the occasion, but nothing happened. Mexico underperformed again, but there was nothing to worry about… they had convenient schedule, playing the last match of tournament against possible troublemakers – Honduras. Possible, for they were hosting the qualifications and thus expected to have some advantage. So what? Mexico was head and shoulders above any CONCACAF team – traditionally so. No matter they were 2 points behind El Salvador before the last match. Surely, they were going to win and with already better goal-difference… yes, Mexico did not show any supremacy so far, they were going to be 2nd, but they were going to the finals. For sure. Honduras had nothing to play for – they already qualified. The mere formality ended in a shocking 0-0 tie and… Mexico was out.

1.Honduras^ 5 8 3 2 1 8- 1

2.El Salvador 5 6 2 2 1 2- 1

3.Mexico 5 5 1 3 1 6- 3

4.Canada 5 5 1 3 1 6- 6

5.Cuba 5 4 1 2 2 4- 8

6.Haiti 5 2 0 2 3 2- 9

May be getting advantage and benefiting from hosting the final qualification round, but going for a first time to the World Cup finals.

May be lucky, after having to fret to the very end of a match they only had to watch, but goiing to the finals for a second time.

To an outside observer – pure exotica, obvious outsiders, perhaps even a good example of the folly to give very weak continents more spots at the World Cup. To a point, two was less than one, for Mexico was more or less the only country outside Europe and South America with relatively decent football. Perhaps, from the standpoint of 1981, the only interesting news about the CONCACAF finalists was political trivia: at the end of the 1960s those countries went into a war, triggered by World Cup qualification match. Now the losers back then, Honduras, helped their enemy to reaching the final. Amusing.