Italy I Division

Italy. No miracles this season – Juventus was dominant, as it should have been. At the bottom – pretty much the expected. Verona dropped too low for reigning champion.

Lecce – pretty much the outsider. Last with 16 points and out.

Bari – 15th and out with 22 points. They scored the least goals in the championship – just 18.

Pisa – the third relegated team. 14th with 23 points.

Udinese – lucky 13th with 25 points.

Avellino – 12th with 27 points.

Sampdoria – 11th with 27 points. More was expected from this team, but… that was it.

Verona, as it was commonly known back than – Hellas Verona, actually. 10th with 28 points. Unfortunately, they were not able to build upon their success – the predicament of small clubs in any country. Losing players rather than gaining more talent.

Como – 9th with 29 points. Not bad – for them.

Atalanta – 8th with 29 points.

Milan – 7th with 31 points. Rather painfully coming back, but on the road to recovery.

Inter – 6th with 32 points. Something not quite right with this team. Most likely the age of Rummenigge and Brady.

Torino – 5th with 33 points. One of the three teams not winning away, even once.

Fiorentina – 4th with 33 points. Underachievers, in a way – this squad should have been a title contender.

Napoli – 3rd with 39 points. Slowly building strength. One expect a team with Maradona to be formidable champion, but Napoli really came out of nowhere and Maradona was pretty much alone. But slowly a strong team was gathering around him – all for the future.

Roma – the closest team to the champions, but not a real threat. Second with 41 points. More or less, running on the inertia from their earlier years. Still very strong, but somewhat they missed the moment to transform themselves into truly great team and now inevitably getting older.

Juventus – simply the best. 18 wins, 9 ties, only 3 lost games, 43-17 goal-difference – best defensive record, second-best strikers, 45 points and one more title. Consistency was the key – no matter what, Juventus had strong squads for very long time and there was no stopping to that. Starting with their coach – Trapattoni – they were the best squad in Italy and practically had no real challenger. It was coming to the point of considering occasional second place a huge failure…

UEFA Cup

The UEFA Cup. Say whatever you like, but this was Spanish year – finalists in every European tournament. Winning was another matter…Barcelona failed, Atletico failed… but Real Madrid did not fail. The road to the final was not easy – at least compared to their opponents. Real faced Borussia Moenchengladbach, tough at the moment Xamax Neuchatel, and Inter Milano at the semi-final. 1. FC Koln was luckier – they met Sporting Gijon in the first round, tough, but beatable, and then the next stronger opponent was in the ¼ finals – Sporting Lisbon, a team like Gijon – tough, but beatable. Then in the semi-finals it was one thing to meet Inter and quite another to face KSW Waregem from Belgium. 1. FC Koln was perhaps a bit lucky, but the West German club football was in its twilight years – not superior at all. Werder and Hamburger SV were eliminated in the first round and by insignificant opponents at that (Chernomoretz Odessa and Sparta Rotterdam). Borussia was no longer the great team of the 1970s – true, they managed fantastic home win against Real Madrid – 5-1 – but only to lose 0-4 in Madrid. The Germans were at least shaky, so Real was seemingly the favourite at the final. They had the stronger squad too – 1.FC Koln in its current version was seemingly weaker squad than the one they had 5-6 years ago. Schumacher, Allofs, and Littbarski was all they had… Bein was still in the early years of his career, not yet a star. Against them perhaps only Real’s goalkeeper Agustin was ordinary player. The rest, if not great stars, were at least national team material, but the attack was on another level: Butragueno, Sanchez, and Valdano with Santillana ready to step in as substitute. Frankly, Koln was clearly going to depend on German character against a team without a weak line, outclassing Koln by far. Then again… the Germans never give up and could roll over anybody and Spaniards were too easily given to brutality, destroying their football. That was traditional wisdom. Which seemingly was right until the 30th minute in the opening leg in Madrid – Allofs scored and Koln was leading. Soon everything changed and in the 89th minute Santillana scored his goal to make it 5-1 Real. The final was practically over before the second leg.

 

Final 1st Leg, Santiago Bernabéu, Madrid, 30 Apr 1986, att 85000

 

Real Madrid (2) 5 1.FC Köln (1) 1

29′ 0-1 K: Allofs

38′ 1-1 RM: Sánchez

42′ 2-1 RM: Gordillo

51′ 3-1 RM: Valdano

84′ 4-1 RM: Valdano

89′ 5-1 RM: Santillana

 

Real Madrid: Agustín; Salguero, Solana, Camacho; Martín Vázquez (Santillana 81), Míchel, Juanito, Gordillo; Butragueño, Sánchez, Valdano

1.FC Köln: Schumacher; Geils, Gielchen, Steiner, Prestin; Geilenkirchen, Hönerbach; Bein (Hässler 70), Janssen; Littbarski (Dickel 83), Allofs

Referee: Courtney (England)

For some reason the second leg was played not in Koln, but in (West) Berlin, but the low attendance was guaranteed no matter the venue after the terrible loss in Madrid – 1. FC Koln was written off. Down, but never out… may be Real was not fully motivated by now, but 1. FC Koln went to play. And they won 2-0. They did whatever then could, may be even more than that, for frankly… it seemed impossible Gielchen, Geilenkirchen, Pisanti to overcome Camacho, Michel, Butragueno. Koln had something like 5-6 strong players when Real had no enough spots in the team for all the talent at their hands and great names had to sit at bench. That was the reality and only miracle could give Koln the cup.

Final 2nd Leg, Olympiastadion, Berlin, 6 May 1986, att 15000

 

1.FC Köln (1) 2 Real Madrid (0) 0

22′ 1-0 K: Bein

72′ 2-0 K: Geilenkirchen

Real won 5-3 on aggregate

 

1.FC Köln: Schumacher; Prestin, Gielchen, Geils (Schmitz 83); Geilenkirchen, Steiner, Bein, Hönerbach, Bein; Janssen (Pisanti 58), Littbarski, Allofs

Real Madrid: Agustín; Chendo, Maceda, Solana, Camacho; Míchel, Gallego, Valdano, Gordillo; Butragueño (Juanito 88), Sánchez (Santillana 20)

Referee: Valentine (Scotland)

Good campaign for 1. FC Koln, but they destroyed in the first leg of the final and the brave second leg was not enough. Thus. 1. FC Koln was unable to put its name along the great West German clubs and probably rightly so – as sturdy and determined the team was, it was not a great one. There were very few outstanding players – may be against another opponent the Germans could have extracted victory, but Real Madrid was too mighty at the moment.

The winners. Standing, left to right: San Jose, Agustrin, Gordillo, Camacho, Maceda, Salguero, Gallego, Valdano, Chendo. Crouching: Butragueno, Martin Vazquez, Michel, Hugo Sanchez, Solana, Luis Molovny – coach.

It was not an easy campaign, especially after Borussia Moenchengladbach won 5-1 in the first leg of the 1/8 finals, but Real came back with vengeance on every occasion, at the end eliminating every opponent on the road. This season the ‘Vulture Squadron’ – ‘La Quinta del Buitre’ -was born and even with some strained personal relations, it was formidable team with so much talent, some had to stay on the bench. Real won a second UEFA Cup in 2 years and was it another club, this team would have been instant legend – but it Real and the UEFA Cup was hardly considered great success: the measure was the European Champions Cup – not winning it meant failure… However, it was still very positive sign, for the club was winning in Europe after a very long dry years and not by accident either. It was Real Madrid, though… UEFA Cup was not enough and Molovny was replaced with Leo Beenhakker right after winning the cup. The victory was perhaps most important to aging Camacho and Santillana, whose whole careers were frustrated by lack of international success – at last they won on European stage and twice in a row, a confirmation of quality and also a justice to both great players, even if coming late.

Cup Winners Cup

Cup Winners Cup. Apart from Celtic, the draw was nice to all stronger teams from start to finish. Well, there were few of them… fewer every year. Up to the ¼ finals, the only really tough draw was in the first round: Atletico Madrid vs Celtic. Those reaching the quarter-finals were the better teams only in terms of this year tournament – in general, not exactly leading European teams at the moment. And the results were quite predictable, no surprises: Rapid Vienna lost to Dinamo Kiev, Dynamo Dresden lost to Bayer Leverkusen, Crvena zvezda Belgrade – to Atletico Madrid. Dukla Prague eliminated Benfica Lisbon thanks to away goal, but this was battle between equals. In the semi-final stage Dinamo Kiev was a bit lucky, drawing the weakest, Dukla Prague – and beating it accordingly. Meantime Atletico Madrid extracted 2 small victories from Bayer Leverkusen – both times by a goal difference. Thus, Atletico Madrid and Dinamo Kiev reached the final. No question about ambition – both teams craved success. Both were in good shape at this time. Was there a favourite? Dinamo was in excellent form and had at last wonderful squad. Atletico Madrid was no joke either and may be even more ambitious than Dinamo, because they had no real European success so far. As for the squad… it was already weakened a bit by the transfer of Hugo Sanchez to Real, but it was old news by now. The 1978 World champion Ubaldo Fillol replaced Sanchez – well, it is not even remotely similar to exchange a great striker for goalkeeper, but nevertheless Fillol was important acquisition, a great star on his own right. Dinamo had the best of the Soviet football, of course.

The final proved to be surprisingly entertaining and quickly Dinamo got the upper hand, scoring in the 5th minute.

Zavarov scored the opening goal, but it was the flying winger Belanov, who captured all attention. Atletico never gave up and tried to play attacking football as well, but was outplayed most of the time.

Naturally, Blokhin got most attention, for he was famous, but it was more than that – now a veteran, he played still wonderful football, perhaps even better than 10 years ago, when he was rather simple left—winger. Now he was taking more playmaking functions and operated on wider zone. Near the end of the match he scored his customary goal and a bit later the substitute Yevtushenko completed the destruction of Atletico Madrid. Atletico played well and the result does not give them justice, but Dinamo was not only excellent, but also scored – and Atletico did not. To a point, the final repeated the one for the European Champions Cup: the winners played against hostile crowd of enemy’s supporters, having practically none of their own.

Final, Stade de Gerland, Lyon, 2 May 1986, att 39000

Dinamo Kiev (1) 3 Atlético Madrid (0) 0

5′ 1-0 DK: Zavarov

85′ 2-0 DK: Blokhin

88′ 3-0 DK: Yevtushenko

Dinamo Kiev: Chanov; Baltacha (Bal 38), Bessonov, Kuznetsov, Demianenko; Rats, Yakovenko, Yaremchuk, Zavarov (Yevtushenko 70); Belanov, Blokhin

Atlético Madrid: Fillol; Tomás, Arteche, Ruiz, Clemente; Prieto, E.Quique, Marina, Landáburu (Setién 61); Cabrera, Da Silva Referee: Wöhrer (Austria)

Captain Anatoly Demyanenko received the Cup Winners Cup.

Dinamo Kiev won the trophy for second time, but perhaps Oleg Blokhin was the happiest of all – the only survivor of the first victory, more than 10 years ago, the only Kiev player to win the Cup Winners Cup twice.

Dinamo Kiev made so dazzling performance, it is easy to dismiss Atletico – but they played well really. Unfortunately, they were not at the same level with Dinamo. Yes, this was strong period for the club, but they were still unable to succeed in Europe. Perhaps the making of the team had something to do with it – only the Argentine Ubaldo Fillol was true world star and he was getting old by now and did not play long in Madrid. Against them played a whole national team (including the substitutes) on the rise. A matter of class and Atletico was outclassed. Too bad.

Dinamo Kiev was unquestionable winner and their second victory was more convincing than the first one – 10 years ago they played against weak and somewhat transitional squad of Ferencvaros Budapest. Now they met opponent in top condition. Naturally, both winning squads were compared and it was tough call: at both occasions the whole Dinamo side were national team regulars. And there were national team players among the reserves as well. But this squad was deemed stronger – it was younger team with great talent, not even fully flourishing in the cases of some players. Back then most players, including Blokhin, were already known – no new discoveries. This time was different: the world discovered the great talent of Belanov, Yaremchuk, Yakovenko. And the noticed promising talent of Zavarov was confirmed. Blokhin was formidable – even better than before, a great case of longevity at top form. Was this vintage better than the old one? Unanswerable question, but one thing was sure – Dinamo played fantastic football and many of the team had long lasting impact, for they – unlike the first winners – eventually went to play professionally in Western Europe. Dinamo had its second great team at last – Lobanovsky did it again. As for Blokhin – may be he really convinced everybody that he was a true world-class player: Lobanovksy was merciless coach, never given to any sentimentality – aging Blokhin was not discarded as some of his former teammates, but remained and continued to be the key player. And Lobanovsky was also vindicated – often under criticism for his methods and failures, he proved his worth by making a second great team and winning again at the European stage.